Broaders v. Welsh
Broaders v. Welsh
Opinion of the Court
'x'The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This case has been decided by the Court on various occasions, and indeed admits of no doubt. 1 Con. Rep. 319.
By the Act
Now why issue an execution against the principal ? It is unnecessary to say the least; the ca. sa. is a demand on the bail to deliver the body, or pay the debt; if they fail to do the first, they may do the second act; if they fail to do the latter, they must do the former; and a scire facias issues against them to compel payment.
It may be of importance to remark on the use of the term, in the Act of 1185,
By the Act of 1185, when common bail is mentioned, bail to the sheriff, or special bail, is meant; and when the term, special bail, is mentioned, bail to the action, or bail above, is intended. Thi.s explanation of the use and meaning of the terms, common and special bail, is necessary to the correct understanding of the decisions of our Courts and construction of our Acts.
It is, then, clear, that no other execution than a ca. sa. is necessary, before proceedings are had against the bail. The motion is discharged.
7 Stat. 109, § 3.
County Court Act, 7 Stat. 215, 2 9. See 2 Rich. 655 ; 1 Strob. 307 ; 1 Rioh. 421; 4 MoC. 175 ; ante, 136.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- F. W. R. Broaders v. N. Welsh and James R. Carter
- Status
- Published