Tunno v. Happoldt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Tunno v. Happoldt, 13 S.C.L. 188 (S.C. 1822)
Colcock, Gantt, Johnson, Nott, Richardson
Tunno v. Happoldt
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court:
The claim of Mr. Ogier was by simple contract, i. e. by a note. And the question is,' can the mortgage deed change the character of the note, or give it a preference to other simple contract debts under the administrators law.
I cannot perceive any reason in supposing the simple contract debt changed by the mortgage, That deed gave a particular lien upion certain property, but here its object and intent terminated, and otherwise left the note as it stood before, still a simple contract. The postea must, therefore, ,be delivered to the plaintiff, with leave to enter up judgment upon the special verdict.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Adam Tunno v. Chris. Happoldt, Adm'r of Jno M. Happoldt
- Status
- Published