Rodgers v. Norton

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Rodgers v. Norton, 16 S.C.L. 5 (S.C. 1823)
Colcock, Gantt, Huger, Johnson, Richard, Roit, Son

Rodgers v. Norton

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Huger,

The act of 1788, for establishing the bounds of the Prisons, &cc. declares, Whereas humanity requires that the confinement of persons on civil process should be less rigorous: Be it enacted, that all prisoners on jnesne process, in any civil *6action, &c. on complying With the requisitions contained in this act, shall be entitled, &c. to the rules.” The words are very broad, <£Prisons and Prisoners,” and these are used throughout-the act.. No where are the words “ free white person” employed. The act therefore does not exclude free persons o. color: nor would it be just, after forcing them into Court, to. Withhold a privilege so important and which is granted to all others. The policy of the law appears to require no such dis crimination.

The motion is refused.

Johnson, Roit, Gantt, Richard* son, Colcock, Justices concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
John Rodgers, ads. Isaac Norton
Status
Published