Crocker v. Hunt
Crocker v. Hunt
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court .*
By the congressional act of 1792, it is declared that every free able bodied white male citizen, between the ages
, The first recited clause requires every citizen enrolled to furnish himself with a musket, &c. and exempts such musket, &c. from suits, &c. The second recited clause impliedly exempts a private or matross of artillery from the necessity of furnishing himself with t.he equipments of a private of infantry, when proper ordnance and field artillery are provided : In this case, however, the plaintiff and his company, not having been furnished with ordnance and artillery, are required to equip themselves as infantry, and their equipments are protected by the act : Had the company been furnished with ordnance and artillery, I should even then doubt whether the plaintiff’s equipments as a private of infantry, were not also exempted. The situation of the country, the improbability of artillery being ever used, the necessity of employing constantly the privates of artillery of militia as patrols, and on other duty requiring the equipments of the infantry, bring them within the policy and spirit of the first clause.
The motion is granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James Crocker v. Jas. Hunt
- Status
- Published