Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1823

Edson v. Cheshire

Edson v. Cheshire
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided May 15, 1823 · Colcock, Huger, Johnson, Nott, Richardson
13 S.C.L. 385

Counsel

O’Neal '8? Johnson, for the motion,-, Rauskett 8? Dunlap, contra.

Edson v. Cheshire

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Colcock

delivered the opinion of the court:

The words of the act admit of no doubt, and leave no discretion on the subject with the Judge. “ No person shall hereafter be held to bail for any sum less than £ 50, current money.” (Public Laws, 273.)

By any mode of computation known to the law on this subject, the sum of $ 30 12 1-2 is less than A50 current. This act was passed in 1769, at which time the current money Jhad not depreciated to the extent that it afterwards *386did, when the scale of depreciation was fixed, and the' value* of the currency at that time was seven for one.

O’Neal '8? Johnson, for the motion,- Rauskett 8? Dunlap, contra.

The motion must therefore be granted.

Justices Johnson7 Huger, Richardson and Nott7 concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.