Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1824

Boulware v. M'Comb

Boulware v. M'Comb
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 15, 1824 · Cdlcock, Gantt, Huger, Richardson
16 S.C.L. 416

Boulware v. M'Comb

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Johnson.

The principle on which this question depends, is founded on the maxirn qui facit per odium, facit per se. The act of the agent is in law the act of the principal, and although it might have been more strictly clerical to set out the manner, yet the legal effect of an act is all that is indispensably necessary. The allegation that the defendant subscribed with his own proper hand was therefore well, (a) The motion dismissed.

Cdlcock, Richardson, Huger, and Gantt, Justices, concurred.

See Heimsley vs. Loder, 2. Camp. 450; Jones et. al. vs. Mars et al. ib. 305; levy vs. Wilson, 5 Esp. Rep. 180; Pease vs. Morgan, 7 John, Rep. 468.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.