Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1836

De Millen v. McAlilley

De Millen v. McAlilley
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided July 1, 1836 · Butler, Earle, Evans, Gantt, Richardson
27 S.C.L. 499

Counsel

T. and M. Williams for the motion., Gregg and McAlillet, contra.

De Millen v. McAlilley

Opinion of the Court

Curia, per

Gantt, J.

The report of the presiding judge in this case is so full and explicit, and his reasoning so satisfactory on the law giving construction to the deed, under which the plaintiff rests her claim, that it is deemed unnecessary to add any thing further in support of the views taken by him. It is therefore adopted as the opinion of the court, and the nonsuit as ordered cannot be set aside. The motion is therefore refused.

Richardson, Butler, Earle and Evans, JJ. concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.