Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1870

35 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1870.

  • In re Kennedy 2 S.C. 216, (S.C. 1870)
  • Shelor v. Mason 2 S.C. 233, (S.C. 1870)
  • Harmon v. Wallace 2 S.C. 208, (S.C. 1870)
  • Neely v. McFadden 2 S.C. 169, (S.C. 1870)
  • McKeegan v. McSwiney 2 S.C. 191, (S.C. 1870)
  • State ex rel. Attorney General v. Platt 2 S.C. 150, (S.C. 1870)
  • Mobley v. Cureton 2 S.C. 140, (S.C. 1870)
  • White v. Kibler 2 S.C. 116, (S.C. 1870)
  • McDow v. Brown 2 S.C. 95, (S.C. 1870)
  • Gunter v. Gunter 2 S.C. 11, (S.C. 1870)
  • Shubrick v. State 2 S.C. 21, (S.C. 1870)
  • Pringle v. Sizer 2 S.C. 59, (S.C. 1870)
  • Walker v. Covar 2 S.C. 16, (S.C. 1870)
  • Burgess v. Carpenter 2 S.C. 7, (S.C. 1870)
  • Caulfield v. State ex rel. Attorney General 1 S.C. 461, (S.C. 1870)
  • Coocan v. State ex rel. Attorney General 1 S.C. 468, (S.C. 1870)
  • Ex parte Nixon 2 S.C. 4, (S.C. 1870)
  • McIver v. State ex rel. Townsend 2 S.C. 1, (S.C. 1870)
  • Alexander H. Abrahams & Co. v. South-western Railroad Bank 1 S.C. 441, (S.C. 1870)
  • Womack v. Austin 1 S.C. 421, (S.C. 1870)
  • Bobo v. Goss 1 S.C. 262, (S.C. 1870)
  • Dunn v. Dunn 1 S.C. 350, (S.C. 1870)
  • Mayer v. Mordecai 1 S.C. 383, (S.C. 1870)
  • Fitzsimons v. Fitzsimons 1 S.C. 400, (S.C. 1870)
  • Baum v. Stern 1 S.C. 415, (S.C. 1870)
  • Moorehead v. Orr 1 S.C. 304, (S.C. 1870)
  • Williams v. Beard 1 S.C. 309, (S.C. 1870)
  • Morgan v. Keenan 1 S.C. 327, (S.C. 1870)
  • Crosby v. Crosby 1 S.C. 337, (S.C. 1870)
  • Jeter v. Tucker 1 S.C. 245, (S.C. 1870)
  • Baldwin v. Cooley 1 S.C. 256, (S.C. 1870)
  • Edwards v. Sartor 1 S.C. 266, (S.C. 1870)
  • Crotwell v. Boozer 1 S.C. 271, (S.C. 1870)
  • Suber v. Pullin 1 S.C. 273, (S.C. 1870)
  • Allen v. Gaillard 1 S.C. 279, (S.C. 1870)

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑