Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1886

Hill v. Wallace

Hill v. Wallace
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided July 14, 1886 · Simpson
25 S.C. 600; 1886 S.C. LEXIS 189

Hill v. Wallace

Opinion of the Court

An administrator having paid all the debts of his intestate (his brother), except a large one of his own, not then barred, retaining only a small sum of money and a watch, in action brought years after-wards by the administrator de bonis non of the first intestate against the representative of the first administrator, the court *601refused to apply the statute of limitations to this unpaid debt, or to charge annual balances, or to require an accounting for the watch.

Decree of Witherspoon, J., Union,affirmed. July 14, 1886. J. Q. Wallace, for appellant. William Munro, contra.

OPINION by MR.

Chief Justice Simpson,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.