Dean v. Todd
Dean v. Todd
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the forfeiture incurred by defendant, under the provisions of sec. 2570 of the Rev. Stat. of 1893. The case was heard by his Honor, Judge Witherspoon, by consent, without a jury, a trial by jury having been waived. Being a law case, the facts as found by the Circuit Judge are conclusive upon this Court, as has been held in numerous cases. Under the facts so found, there can be no doubt that the judgment rendered is free from error. The language of the section above cited is so plain as to leave no room for argument. See Tinsley v. Kirby, 8 S. C., 113, where a similar statutory provision was enforced. In justice to all parties concerned, the reporter should incorporate in his report of the case the decree of the Circuit Judge, where the facts will be found fully and clearly set forth, as well as the grounds of appeal.
In justice, however, to the defendant, who is a public
The judgment of this Court, therefore, is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days after written notice of this judgment, enter a remittitur on the record for the sum of $1; and that upon the entry of such remittitur, the judgment appealed from be affirmed for the sum of $10.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DEAN v. TODD
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Costs — Magistrate—Oeeicer—Damages.—A magistrate has no right to tax costs for services not performed, and when he so taxes and collects it, he is liable to the party paying it, under Rev. Stat., 2570, for ten times the amount so unlawfully collected.