Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1902

185 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1902.

  • Heyward v. Williams 41 S.E. 550, (S.C. 1902)
  • McLaughlin v. Braddy 41 S.E. 523, (S.C. 1902)
  • Martin v. Burgess 41 S.E. 450, (S.C. 1902)
  • Simmons v. Western Union Tel. Co. 41 S.E. 521, (S.C. 1902)
  • Wylie v. Commercial & Farmers Bank 41 S.E. 504, (S.C. 1902)
  • Kennedy v. Roundtree 41 S.E. 477, (S.C. 1902)
  • Davis v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co. 41 S.E. 468, (S.C. 1902)
  • Machen v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 41 S.E. 448, (S.C. 1902)
  • South Bound R. R. v. Burton 41 S.E. 451, (S.C. 1902)
  • McDaniel v. Monroe Bros. 41 S.E. 456, (S.C. 1902)
  • Telephone Manufacturing Co. v. Sumter Telephone Manufacturing Co. 41 S.E. 322, (S.C. 1902)
  • Bostick v. Ammons 41 S.E. 310, (S.C. 1902)
  • Thompson v. Security Trust & Life Ins. 41 S.E. 464, (S.C. 1902)
  • Roberts & Hoge v. Pipkin & McCallum 41 S.E. 300, (S.C. 1902)
  • Turner v. Poston 41 S.E. 296, (S.C. 1902)
  • Edwards v. Southern Ry. 41 S.E. 458, (S.C. 1902)
  • Lowe v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 41 S.E. 297, (S.C. 1902)
  • Southern Ry. v. Beaudrot 41 S.E. 299, (S.C. 1902)
  • Lloyd v. Rawl 41 S.E. 312, (S.C. 1902)
  • Polite v. Bero 41 S.E. 305, (S.C. 1902)
  • Wylie v. McFadden 41 S.E. 320, (S.C. 1902)
  • Hollings v. Bankers Union of the World 41 S.E. 90, (S.C. 1902)
  • Railroad Company v. Telephone Company 41 S.E. 307, (S.C. 1902)
  • Ex Parte Johnson 41 S.E. 308, (S.C. 1902)
  • South Carolina & Georgia R. R. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. 63 S.C. 199, (S.C. 1902)
  • Rutledge v. Tunno 63 S.C. 205, (S.C. 1902)
  • Porter v. Charleston & Savannah Ry. Co. 41 S.E. 108, (S.C. 1902)
  • Wm. E. Holmes & Co. v. Moore 41 S.E. 90, (S.C. 1902)
  • State Ex Rel. Lockwood v. Adams 41 S.E. 82, (S.C. 1902)
  • Groce v. Ponder 41 S.E. 83, (S.C. 1902)
  • Carolina Grocery Co. v. Moore 41 S.E. 88, (S.C. 1902)
  • Few v. Keller 41 S.E. 85, (S.C. 1902)
  • Hunter v. Bamberg Co. 41 S.E. 26, (S.C. 1902)
  • Shuck v. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n 41 S.E. 28, (S.C. 1902)
  • Moon v. Bruce 40 S.E. 1030, (S.C. 1902)
  • Hutmacher v. Charleston Consolidated Railway, Gas & Electric Co. 40 S.E. 1029, (S.C. 1902)
  • Ex Parte Wessinger 41 S.E. 17, (S.C. 1902)
  • Emanuel v. Ferris 41 S.E. 20, (S.C. 1902)
  • Bush v. Southern Ry. 40 S.E. 1029, (S.C. 1902)
  • Easley Town Council v. Pegg 41 S.E. 18, (S.C. 1902)
  • Hunter v. Hunter 41 S.E. 33, (S.C. 1902)
  • Gilreath v. Greenville County 40 S.E. 1028, (S.C. 1902)
  • Lockhart v. Severance 40 S.E. 1026, (S.C. 1902)
  • McDowell v. Russell 40 S.E. 1032, (S.C. 1902)
  • Burns v. Southern Ry. 40 S.E. 1018, (S.C. 1902)
  • State v. Napier 41 S.E. 13, (S.C. 1902)
  • Lipscomb v. Littlejohn 40 S.E. 1023, (S.C. 1902)
  • Protestant Episcopal Church v. Prioleau 40 S.E. 1026, (S.C. 1902)
  • State v. Holcomb 40 S.E. 1017, (S.C. 1902)
  • Halk v. Stoddard 40 S.E. 957, (S.C. 1902)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑