Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1907

Wannamaker v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided May 1, 1907 · Pope, Krugh, Woods

57 S.E. 665; 77 S.C. 64; 1907 S.C. LEXIS 110 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. Barron Ray and D.C. Ray , for appellant, cite: 18 S.C. 204 ; 27 S.C. 197 ; 31 S.C. 565 ; 2 Pom. Eq. Rem., sec. 835; 6 Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 835; 18 N.J. Eq., 124-128; 44 Ill., 299 ; 23 Pac., 695; 26 N.J. Eq., 330 ; 73 Pa. St., 485; 41 Ohio St., 636 ; 56 N.Y., 12 ; 37 Am. St. R., 894; 2 App. D.C., 207 ; 94 N.C. 304 ; 98 N.W., 724; Pom. Spec. Perfm., sec. 462; 2 Warvelle on Vend., 769; Waterman Spec. Per., sec 511. Messrs. DePass DePass , contra, cite: Story Eq. Jur., secs. 734, 742; 67 S.C. 216 ; 69 S.C. 373 ; 2 Strob., 81; 4 Rich. Law, 516; 5 Rich. L., 374; 27 S.C. 123 ; 3 C.E. Green., 124; 2 Grant's Case, 103; 12 Mich., 193 ; 14 Allen, 94, 1; 116 Mass. 90 ; 4 Rich. L., 374; 4 Mass. 629 ; 2 N. McC., 186; 3 McC., 449; 9 Rich., 378; 4 Kent. Com. L., 67; Platt on Con. Ch., 2d ed., 4.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*67 Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

The facts of this case are set out in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.

Appeal dismissed.

Mr. Justicr Woods did not sit in this case becaiise disqualiñed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.