Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1909

242 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1909.

  • Magill v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 66 S.E. 561, (S.C. 1909)
  • Greenville County v. City of Greenville 66 S.E. 417, (S.C. 1909)
  • Mayfield v. Southern Ry. 66 S.E. 405, (S.C. 1909)
  • Auten v. Catawba Power Co. 65 S.E. 274, (S.C. 1909)
  • Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 66 S.E. 415, (S.C. 1909)
  • Deschamps v. Railroad Co. 66 S.E. 414, (S.C. 1909)
  • Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 66 S.E. 416, (S.C. 1909)
  • DesChamps v. Atlantic Cost Line R. R. 84 S.C. 358, (S.C. 1909)
  • Woodstock Hardwood & Spool Mfg. Co. v. Charleston Light & Water Co. 66 S.E. 194, (S.C. 1909)
  • Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 66 S.E. 409, (S.C. 1909)
  • Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway v. McCown 66 S.E. 418, (S.C. 1909)
  • Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co. 66 S.E. 294, (S.C. 1909)
  • Taber v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 66 S.E. 292, (S.C. 1909)
  • Jackson v. Southern Ry. 66 S.E. 181, (S.C. 1909)
  • Asbill v. Martin 66 S.E. 297, (S.C. 1909)
  • McKittrick v. Greenville Traction Co. 66 S.E. 289, (S.C. 1909)
  • Roberts v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. 66 S.E. 298, (S.C. 1909)
  • Town of Seneca v. Cochran 66 S.E. 288, (S.C. 1909)
  • Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Hunter 66 S.E. 177, (S.C. 1909)
  • Kelly v. Southern Ry. 66 S.E. 198, (S.C. 1909)
  • Erskine v. Markham 66 S.E. 286, (S.C. 1909)
  • High v. Wingo 66 S.E. 185, (S.C. 1909)
  • Marthinson v. McCutchen 66 S.E. 120, (S.C. 1909)
  • Owen v. Bankers Life Insurance 66 S.E. 290, (S.C. 1909)
  • Matheson v. Rogers 65 S.E. 1054, (S.C. 1909)
  • Humphries v. Union & Glenn Springs R. R. 65 S.E. 1051, (S.C. 1909)
  • Earle v. City of Greenville 65 S.E. 1050, (S.C. 1909)
  • Rookard v. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. 65 S.E. 1047, (S.C. 1909)
  • Whaley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 65 S.E. 1022, (S.C. 1909)
  • Love v. Turner 65 S.E. 1043, (S.C. 1909)
  • Alexander v. Herndon 65 S.E. 1048, (S.C. 1909)
  • Smith & Co. v. Southern Ry. 65 S.E. 1029, (S.C. 1909)
  • Mulligan v. Southern Ry. 65 S.E. 1040, (S.C. 1909)
  • Glenn v. Western Union Tel. Co. 65 S.E. 1024, (S.C. 1909)
  • British & American Mortgage Co. v. Strait 65 S.E. 1038, (S.C. 1909)
  • Berry v. City of Greenville 65 S.E. 1030, (S.C. 1909)
  • Heiden v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 65 S.E. 987, (S.C. 1909)
  • Grant v. Southern Ry. 65 S.E. 1022, (S.C. 1909)
  • Holladay v. Hodge 65 S.E. 1019, (S.C. 1909)
  • Faris v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. 65 S.E. 1017, (S.C. 1909)
  • Williams v. Newton 65 S.E. 959, (S.C. 1909)
  • Kelly v. United States Health & Accident Insurance 65 S.E. 949, (S.C. 1909)
  • Holladay v. Hodge 65 S.E. 952, (S.C. 1909)
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Austin 65 S.E. 982, (S.C. 1909)
  • Huguelet v. Warfield 65 S.E. 985, (S.C. 1909)
  • Vale Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Santee River Cypress Lumber Co. 65 S.E. 955, (S.C. 1909)
  • Bolton v. Western Union Tel. Co. 65 S.E. 937, (S.C. 1909)
  • Lewis v. Western Union Tel. Co. 65 S.E. 941, (S.C. 1909)
  • Boyd v. Trexler 65 S.E. 936, (S.C. 1909)
  • McCoy v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 65 S.E. 939, (S.C. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑