Shute v. Shute

Counsel

Mr. J. Harry Foster, for appellant , cites: Evidence tending to change the deed to a will incompetent: 42 S.C. 66 ; 27 S.C. 380 ; 20 S.C. 57 ; 40 S.C. 145 . Parol evidence not admissible to show delivery of deed: 40 S.C. 328 ; 32 S.C. 400 ; McKilvey on Ev., 172; 43 N.Y., 279 ; 16 S.C. 843 ; 79 S.C. 154 ; 15 L.R.A. (N.S.), 589; Elliott on Ev., sec. 674; 16 S.E., 843 ; 37 S.C. 417 ; 43 S.C. 726 ; 50 S.C. 986 ; 12 Ency., 421; Whar. on Ev., sec. 511; 70 Am. St. R., 918; 36 S.C. 485 ; 19 S.C. 68 ; 37 S.C. 429 ; 38 S.C. 212 ; 74 S.C. 102 ; 63 S.C. 572 . Presumption from record of deed: 19 S.C. 211 ; 52 S.C. 474 ; 9 Rich. Eq., 203. Estoppel: Big. on Estp., 453, 434; 13 S.C. 375 . Laches: 52 S.C. 368 ; 12 Ency., 545; 52 S.C. 252 ; 68 S.C. 36 ; 26 S.C. 186 . Delivery of deed: 90 Am. St. R., 164; 154 Ill., 199 ; 61 Am. St. R., 176; 96 Am. St. R., 312; 90 Am. St. R., 22; 61 Am. St. R., 915; 79 Am. St. R., 683; 73 Am. St. R., 452; 53 Am. St. R., 536; 65 Am. St. R., 296; 44 S.C. 372 ; 23 S.C. 91 ; 19 S.C. 215 ; Martindale on Conveyancing, secs. 205, 197, 222; 67 Am. Dec., 270; 50 Am. St. R., 188; 30 Am. Dec. 75; 55 Am. R., 399; 50 Am. St. R., 512; 33 Am. Dec., 688; 82 Am. St. R., 478; 61 Am. St. R., 132; 109 Am. St. R., 311; 20 Am. St. R., 189; 75 Am. St. R., 478; 57 N.E., 548; 33 Am. R., 172; 2 Am. R., 72. Mr. R.B. Allison , contra, cites: Statute of Limitations not applicable; 77 S.C. 129 ; 35 S.C. 610 .