State v. Jones

Supreme Court of South Carolina
State v. Jones, 65 S.E. 444 (S.C. 1909)
83 S.C. 432; 1909 S.C. LEXIS 170
Hydrick

State v. Jones

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

On hearing the return of the respondent, A. W. Jones, to the alternative writ of mandamus issued by me on the 27th day of August, A. D. 1909, whereby he was required to perform the acts therein enjoined, or, failing to do so, to appear before me at the consultation room of the Justices of the Supreme Court, in the city of Columbia, S. C., at 10 o’clock A. M., on this 28th day of August, 1909, then and there to show cause why the said writ should not be made peremptory ; and it appearing upon the hearing of said return that the respondent has failed, and refused and still fails and refuses, to perform the acts enjoined upon him by said writ, and no just cause or excuse for such failure and refusal having been shown by the respondent:

Now, on motion of the attorneys for the State, Messrs. J. P. Grace, Walter Hazard and Hunter A. Gibbes, after hearing G. Duncan Bellinger, Esq., attorney for the respondent, it is

Ordered and adjudged: That the return of the respondent is insufficient in law, and that the writ is hereby made peremptory and that the respondent, A. W. Jones, do forthwith appear and attend with the other members of the State Board of Canvassers and proceed to the deliberation upon and the determination of all matters pending before said board.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Jones, Comptroller.
Status
Published
Syllabus
Mandamus — State Board op Canvassers. — An individual member of the State Board of Canvassers may be compelled by mandamus to attend a meeting of the board and make up a quorum for hearing contests, although the contests raise the issue of the constitutionality of the act under which the special election, which it is the duty of the board to canvass, was held and the member is of opinion the board has no power to pass on such issue.