1909
280 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1909.
- Pyross v. Fraser 64 S.E. 407, (S.C. 1909)
- Montague v. Priester 64 S.E. 393, (S.C. 1909)
- State v. Lindsay 63 S.E. 1064, (S.C. 1909)
- Black v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 418, (S.C. 1909)
- Atherton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 411, (S.C. 1909)
- McMeekin v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 413, (S.C. 1909)
- Tenhet v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 232, (S.C. 1909)
- Fass v. Western Union Tel. Co. 64 S.E. 235, (S.C. 1909)
- Jones v. McCreery Land & Investment Co. 64 S.E. 225, (S.C. 1909)
- Railroad Commissioners v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R. 64 S.E. 240, (S.C. 1909)
- Martin v. Hutto 64 S.E. 421, (S.C. 1909)
- Holden v. Alexander 62 S.E. 1108, (S.C. 1909)
- Fort v. First National Bank 64 S.E. 405, (S.C. 1909)
- Laird v. Piedmont Mutual Fire Ins. 64 S.E. 404, (S.C. 1909)
- Lyles v. Kinard 64 S.E. 409, (S.C. 1909)
- Board of Township Commissioners v. Buckley 64 S.E. 163, (S.C. 1909)
- Foster v. Bailey 64 S.E. 423, (S.C. 1909)
- Hallums v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 147, (S.C. 1909)
- Berley v. Western Union Tel. Co. 64 S.E. 157, (S.C. 1909)
- Cooke v. Paris Mountain Water Co. 64 S.E. 157, (S.C. 1909)
- Mills v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 238, (S.C. 1909)
- Fullerton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 142, (S.C. 1909)
- Gambrell v. Gambrell 64 S.E. 1135, (S.C. 1909)
- English v. McDowall 64 S.E. 390, (S.C. 1909)
- Faulk v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R. 64 S.E. 383, (S.C. 1909)
- State v. Washington 64 S.E. 386, (S.C. 1909)
- Sevier v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 390, (S.C. 1909)
- J. W. Griffith & Bro. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 222, (S.C. 1909)
- Hypes v. Southern Railway 64 S.E. 395, (S.C. 1909)
- Griffin v. Griffin 64 S.E. 160, (S.C. 1909)
- Rogers v. Morrells 64 S.E. 143, (S.C. 1909)
- Goodwin v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 64 S.E. 242, (S.C. 1909)
- Clio Gin Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. 64 S.E. 426, (S.C. 1909)
- Ex Parte Hollis 64 S.E. 232, (S.C. 1909)
- Hasten Furniture Co. v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 223, (S.C. 1909)
- Berley & Kyzer v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R. 64 S.E. 397, (S.C. 1909)
- Sutton v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 401, (S.C. 1909)
- Ancrum v. Camden Water, Light & Ice Co. 64 S.E. 151, (S.C. 1909)
- State v. Turner 64 S.E. 424, (S.C. 1909)
- Platteau v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. 64 S.E. 146, (S.C. 1909)
- State v. Lopez 64 S.E. 144, (S.C. 1909)
- Bardin v. Commercial Insurance & Trust 64 S.E. 165, (S.C. 1909)
- Mims v. Western Union Tel. Co. 64 S.E. 236, (S.C. 1909)
- Cousar Mercantile Co. v. Southern Ry. 64 S.E. 391, (S.C. 1909)
- Mayrant v. City of Columbia 64 S.E. 416, (S.C. 1909)
- Bullock v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. 64 S.E. 234, (S.C. 1909)
- Deschamps v. Railroad Co. 64 S.E. 144, (S.C. 1909)
- Sigwald v. City Bank 64 S.E. 398, (S.C. 1909)
- York Supply Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. 64 S.E. 387, (S.C. 1909)
- Grant v. City Council of Charleston 64 S.E. 388, (S.C. 1909)