City of Columbia v. Spigner
City of Columbia v. Spigner
Opinion of the Court
In this proceeding for mandamus the Circuit Judge in his decree ordering the mandamus to issue, said “it was admitted on both sides at the hearing that the pleadings herein raised no issue of fact,” and the case was decided by the Circuit Court and heard in this Court on the pleadings without the taking of evidence. One of the.exceptions of the defendant is directed to this finding of the Circuit Court. This Court heard the cause and has filed a decree reversing the judgment of the Circuit Court, and a petition has been filed for a rehearing. Upon a careful reconsideration and review of the entire case, we have reached the conclusion that the pleadings raise important issues of fact and that the cause cannot 'be justly decided until there has been a finding of the facts after hearing evidence.
It is therefore adjudged that the decree of this Court be withdrawn from the files, and that this order be substituted therefor, that the judgment of the Circuit Court ’be reversed and the cause be remanded to that Court for a new trial on the evidence to be taken in such manner as the Circuit Court may direct. •
Reference
- Full Case Name
- City of Columbia v. Spigner.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Rehearing — Mandamus—Opinion Withdrawn. — On petition for rehearing, the finding by the Circuit Court that it is admitted the pleadings raise no issues of fact, is reversed, and the opinion heretofore filed on the theory that this finding was correct is withdrawn, and case remanded for new trial on evidence.