Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912

State v. Seay

State v. Seay
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided April 24, 1912 · No. 8194 · PER CURIAM.
74 S.E. 652; 91 S.C. 342; 1912 S.C. LEXIS 232 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Solicitor J.C. Otts for the State, appellant.

State v. Seay

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It appearing, upon the call of this case, that the only notice served by the appellant was upon an attorney who was not authorized to accept service for the respondent, and who only accepted on condition that he should be employed by the respondent; and it further appearing that the time for appealing has expired,

It is, therefore, ordered, that the appeal be dismissed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.