State v. Seay
State v. Seay
74 S.E. 652; 91 S.C. 342; 1912 S.C. LEXIS 232
(South Eastern Reporter)
Opinion of the Court
It appearing, upon the call of this case, that the only notice served by the appellant was upon an attorney who was not authorized to accept service for the respondent, and who only accepted on condition that he should be employed by the respondent; and it further appearing that the time for appealing has expired,
It is, therefore, ordered, that the appeal be dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.