Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1913

199 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1913.

  • Everett v. Bennettsville & Cheraw R. R. 80 S.E. 485, (S.C. 1913)
  • Nunnamaker v. Smith's 80 S.E. 465, (S.C. 1913)
  • Lyles v. Williams 80 S.E. 470, (S.C. 1913)
  • Midland Roofing Mfg. Co. v. Pickens 80 S.E. 484, (S.C. 1913)
  • McCullough v. Spencer 80 S.E. 466, (S.C. 1913)
  • Donaldson v. Temple 80 S.E. 437, (S.C. 1913)
  • Stone v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 80 S.E. 433, (S.C. 1913)
  • Philadelphia Life Ins. v. Arnold 81 S.E. 964, (S.C. 1913)
  • Wetmore v. McElroy 80 S.E. 266, (S.C. 1913)
  • Ex Parte Dominick 80 S.E. 193, (S.C. 1913)
  • Trexler Lumber Co. v. Wilson 80 S.E. 271, (S.C. 1913)
  • Smith v. Southern Railway-Carolina Division 79 S.E. 1099, (S.C. 1913)
  • Marion County Lumber Co. v. Hodges 79 S.E. 1096, (S.C. 1913)
  • Huggins v. Price 79 S.E. 798, (S.C. 1913)
  • McAulay v. McAulay 79 S.E. 785, (S.C. 1913)
  • Crosby v. Wiggins Land Co. 79 S.E. 897, (S.C. 1913)
  • Hiller v. Bank of Columbia 79 S.E. 899, (S.C. 1913)
  • Eberle v. Southern Railway Co. 79 S.E. 792, (S.C. 1913)
  • Silverthorne v. Barnwell Lumber Co. 79 S.E. 519, (S.C. 1913)
  • Hoover v. Thames 79 S.E. 795, (S.C. 1913)
  • Citizens Savings Bank v. Efird 79 S.E. 637, (S.C. 1913)
  • Parish v. Town of Yorkville 79 S.E. 635, (S.C. 1913)
  • Mullaly v. Smyth 79 S.E. 634, (S.C. 1913)
  • City of Anderson v. Fant 79 S.E. 641, (S.C. 1913)
  • Strickland v. Strickland 79 S.E.2d 520, (S.C. 1913)
  • Wynne v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 79 S.E. 521, (S.C. 1913)
  • Rigby v. Gaymon 79 S.E.2d 518, (S.C. 1913)
  • Deaver-Jeter Co. v. Southern Ry. 79 S.E.2d 709, (S.C. 1913)
  • Bethea v. Allen 79 S.E. 639, (S.C. 1913)
  • State Ex Rel. Sims v. McMaster 79 S.E. 405, (S.C. 1913)
  • Huggins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 79 S.E. 406, (S.C. 1913)
  • Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 79 S.E. 645, (S.C. 1913)
  • State Ex Rel. Bates v. Board of County Commissioners 79 S.E. 309, (S.C. 1913)
  • State v. Spears 79 S.E. 315, (S.C. 1913)
  • Owens v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. 80 S.E. 499, (S.C. 1913)
  • Furniture Company v. Railway Company 79 S.E. 700, (S.C. 1913)
  • Varnville Furniture Co. v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. 79 S.E. 700, (S.C. 1913)
  • Aldrich v. Southern Railway Co. 79 S.E. 816, (S.C. 1913)
  • State Ex Rel. Ray v. Blease 79 S.E. 247, (S.C. 1913)
  • State v. Stone 79 S.E. 108, (S.C. 1913)
  • State v. Wade 79 S.E. 106, (S.C. 1913)
  • Simpson v. Cox 79 S.E. 102, (S.C. 1913)
  • Royal Exchange Assurance v. Bennettsville & Cheraw Railroad 79 S.E. 104, (S.C. 1913)
  • Mims v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 78 S.E. 1031, (S.C. 1913)
  • Still v. Creech 78 S.E. 1039, (S.C. 1913)
  • Matheson v. Marion County Lumber Co. 78 S.E. 970, (S.C. 1913)
  • Smyly v. Colleton Cypress Co. 78 S.E. 1026, (S.C. 1913)
  • Beck v. Northwestern R. R. 78 S.E. 994, (S.C. 1913)
  • Ex Parte Massee 79 S.E. 97, (S.C. 1913)
  • Magill v. Southern Railway 78 S.E. 1033, (S.C. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑