Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914

Blackwell v. Harrelson

Blackwell v. Harrelson
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided September 24, 1914 · No. 8935 · MR. JUSTICE WATTS.
84 S.E. 233; 99 S.C. 264; 1914 S.C. LEXIS 129 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. Robt. B. Scarborough and W.F. Stackhouse , for appellant, submit: The expectant estate of C.H. Harrelson was a subject of alienation: 3 McC. 411; 4 DeS. 651; 17 S.C. 592 ; 21 S.C. 55 ; 2 Pom. Eq. Juris., sec. 953; 3 Ib. , sec. 1287. His deed operated by way of estoppel: 71 S.C. 67 ; 93 S.C. 258 . Its record gave notice to creditors and purchasers: Civil Code, sec. 3542. The rights of the grantee accrued prior to the extention of credit, or rights of plaintiff, distinguishing 21 S.C. 212 . Purchaser's rights measured by those of the judgment debtor: 28 S.C. 223 ; 2 Rich. Eq. 185; 93 S.C. 254 , distinguished. Messrs. Henry Buck and A.F. Woods , for respondent, submit: Deed of expectant devise not effective until death of testatrix: 1 McC. 517; 36 S.C. 43 ; 73 S.C. 469 ; 5 Rich. 9. Record prior to acquisition of title not notice to creditors: 93 S.C. 254 ; 95 S.C. 347 ; 21 S.C. 212 ; 28 S.C. 223 . Deed conveyed only such interest as grantor had at date of its execution: 4 McC. 96; 75 S.C. 437 ; 85 S.C. 438 ; 96 S.C. 145 ; and no further interest: 37 Am. Dec. 130; 73 N.W. 932; 5 Rich. 9; 36 Am. St. Rep. 558: and the estoppel cannot apply to after-acquired interest: 71 S.C. 67 , distinguished. Quitclaim deed: 34 S.C. 559 ; 58 Am. Dec. 575; 38 N.E. 334; 126 S.W. 655; 75 A. 73.

Blackwell v. Harrelson

Opinion of the Court

September 24, 1914. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons stated by his Honor, T.H. Spain, in his Circuit decree, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed. *Page 276

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.