Seminole Mfg. Co. v. Howard.

Counsel

Mr. Jno. F. Williams , for appellant, cites: Right of removal: Code 1912, sec. 1149; 76 S.C. 395 ; 92 S.C. 485 ; 13 Cyc. 1043; 78 S.C. 177 ; 4 Mun. 150; 31 N.W. 645; 36 Cyc. 1145, 1164; Ann Cas., 1913 D., 879n, 1209n. Right to injunction on rule to show cause: 2 High 1325; 68 Am. St. R. 111; 26 Vol. 354; 42 Am. St. R. 234n; 78 S.C. 173 ; 66 S.C. 1 ; 86 S.C. 503 ; 75 S.C. 236 . Messrs. Hendersons , contra, cite: Is injunction proper remedy? Throop on Public Officers, sec. 846; Beach on Inj., sec. 1380; Hilliard 443; High, sec. 1385; 61 Am. St. R. 896; 15 At. R. 730; 90 S.C. 5 , 400 . Right of appointment and removal: 78 S.C. 177 ; 92 S.C. 455 ; Throop on Pub. Off., sec. 303; 21 Am. St. R. 561. Right to remove without hearing: 92 S.C. 474 ; Throop on Pub. Off., secs. 378-9. Removal should only be made by concurrent acts of sheriff and corporation: 89 S.C. 113 ; 90 S.C. 5 ; 87 Am. St. R. 377; 12 M.E. 107; 92 S.C. 474 .