Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914

Muckenfuss v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided April 2, 1914 · Gary

80 S.E. 460; 97 S.C. 46; 1914 S.C. LEXIS 132 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. Sanders DePass and B.L. Abney , for the appellant, cite: Discretion must be governed by rule: 47 S.C. 498 ; 15 S.C. 328 ; 60 S.C. 140 ; 68 S.C. 37 ; 94 S.C. 17 . Messrs. John T. Seibels and Stanyarne Wilson , for respondents, cite: Motion properly refused: 79 S.C. 469 ; 81 S.C. 355 ; 65 S.C. 224 ; 66 S.C. 17 ; 91 S.C. 424 .

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

*50 This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Judge refusing a motion to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain in the particulars mentioned in the notice of motion.

The authorities cited in the brief of the respondents’ attorneys fully sustain the ruling of the Circuit Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.