State v. McKinney
State v. McKinney
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
On trial of defendant for assault and battery with intent to kill, a witness, Brown, testified on the part of the State that he was working in the room in which the fight occurred; that he did not see the fight, but heard some one hollo, and looked and saw Smith, the prosecutor, holding his left side *359 and bending over; that he ran to him, but, before he did, saw the defendant going through the door; that when he got to Smith (and he said he was the first one to get to him), he asked him what was the matter; that he replied, “Oh, Brown, McKinney has cut me all to pieces;” that he asked, “What did you let him do that for?” and he replied, “He cut me before I knew what he was doing.” The single question is whether this declaration was properly admitted as part of the res gestae. The following cases show that it was: State v. Belcher, 13 S. C. 459; State v. McDaniel, 68 S. C. 304, 47 S. E. 384, 102 Am. St. Rep. 661; State v. Way, 76 S. C. 91, 56 S. E. 653; State v. Martin, 94 S. C. 92, 77 S. E. 721.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State v. McKinney.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Criminal Law — Evidence—Res Gestae. — In a prosecution for assault and battery with intent to kill, testimony of a witness that he was working in the room where the fight occurred; did not see it, but heard a shout, looked, saw the prosecutor holding his left side, and bending over; that he ran .to him, .but, before he did, saw the defendant going through the door; that when asking the prosecutor what was the matter, was told that the defendant “had cut him all to pieces” before he knew what he was doing — was admissible as part of the res gestae.