Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916

State Ex Rel. Shull v. Manning, Governor

Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided April 18, 1916 · PER CURIAM.

88 S.E. 471; 104 S.C. 260; 1916 S.C. LEXIS 109 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. James S. Verner, G. Duncan Bellinger, T.C. Brown and J.H. Hammond , for petitioners.

Opinion of the Court

The following order was made

Per Curiam.

Upon due consideration of the within petition, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have failed to make such showing as calls for this issuance of the writ prayed for. It is, therefore, ordered that the petition be dismissed.

Footnote. — As to noninterference by the judiciary with executive action, see State v. Blease, 80 S. E. 263, not reported in the official reports. Mandamjis in connection with, recall elections, see notes in 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 229.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.