State v. Highsmith
Supreme Court of South Carolina
State v. Highsmith, 87 S.E. 482 (S.C. 1916)
103 S.C. 168; 1916 S.C. LEXIS 1
PER CURIAM.
State v. Highsmith
Opinion of the Court
The motion is by defendant, Highsmith, to suspend the operation of Judge Shipp’s order until the appeal by Highsmith from Judge Mauldin’s order shall have been heard and decided.
We think the motion must be granted, but only upon’ execution of a bond for $200, with surety to be approved by the clerk of Court for Sumter, conditioned ,to pay so much as the plaintiff, Thompson, may recover in his action against Highsmith.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State v. Highsmith. Thompson v. Same.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal and Error — Supersedeas — Contempt. — -Where defendant appealed from an order granting an injunction, and pending his appéal, another Judge found him guilty of contempt in violating the original order, and decreed punishment, the appellate Court will on execution of bond suspend the operation of both orders until the appeal from the first be determined.