Wesley M.E. Church v. City of Columbia
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- German Evangelical Lutheran Church v. City of Charleston (S.C. 2003)
- United States v. 9.94 A. OF LAND, IN CITY OF CHARLESTON (District Court, E.D. South Carolina 1943)
- Sutton v. Town of Fort Mill (S.C. 1933)
- City of Greenville v. Query (S.C. 1930)
- Kansas City v. Fairfax Drainage Dist. (10th Cir. 1929)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The appeal presents a single issue of law. It is not denied that if the pavement in issue had been put down before the lot of a citizen, that the citizen would be bound to pay for it. It is only denied that a like obligation rests on the plaintiff here, because the plaintiff is a church, and its property is by the fundamental law exempt from “taxation.”
The charge in the instant case was not a tax within the meaning of the Constitution of 1895. That issue is thoroughly discussed, and decided adverse to the appellant, in Railroad v. Decatur, 147 U. S. 190, 13 Sup. Ct. 293, 37 D. Ed. 132.
The judgment below is affirmed.
Footnote.- — -As to the distinction between .taxes and assessments, see Jackson v. Breeland, 103 S. C. 184, 88 S. E. 128; liability to local assessments of property exempt from taxation, see notes in 15 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 349, 29 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1913d, 1114, 35 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1915a, 219, 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451, 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 303, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 57.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.