Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1916

218 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1916.

  • J. C. Lynch & Son v. Cusaac 89 S.E. 392, (S.C. 1916)
  • Smith v. Phifer 89 S.E. 323, (S.C. 1916)
  • Metts v. Charleston Theatre Co. 89 S.E. 389, (S.C. 1916)
  • Henry Mercantile Co. v. Georgetown & W. R. Co. 89 S.E. 480, (S.C. 1916)
  • Young v. Brabham 89 S.E. 472, (S.C. 1916)
  • Beacham v. City of Greenville 89 S.E. 401, (S.C. 1916)
  • Lawton-Gillespie Co. v. Amer. Cent. Ins. Co. 89 S.E. 385, (S.C. 1916)
  • Creswell v. Wardlaw 89 S.E. 317, (S.C. 1916)
  • Jeffords v. Muldrow 89 S.E. 357, (S.C. 1916)
  • City of Rock Hill v. Worthy 89 S.E. 393, (S.C. 1916)
  • Nixon & Wright v. Robinson 89 S.E. 920, (S.C. 1916)
  • Creps v. City of Columbia 89 S.E. 316, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. McKinney 89 S.E. 353, (S.C. 1916)
  • Poston v. Lyerly 89 S.E. 392, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Vosburg 89 S.E. 314, (S.C. 1916)
  • American Bank v. Sublett 89 S.E. 319, (S.C. 1916)
  • Scott v. Seymour 89 S.E. 398, (S.C. 1916)
  • Spence v. Phoenix Assur. Co. 89 S.E. 319, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Vosburgh 89 S.E. 314, (S.C. 1916)
  • Aldrich v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 89 S.E. 315, (S.C. 1916)
  • La Tourette v. McMaster 89 S.E. 398, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Shaw 89 S.E. 322, (S.C. 1916)
  • Hogg v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. 89 S.E. 102, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Bethune 89 S.E. 153, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Wilson 89 S.E. 301, (S.C. 1916)
  • Morgan Silver Plate Co. v. Bobo Undertaking Co. 92 S.E. 720, (S.C. 1916)
  • Outlaw v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics 88 S.E. 801, (S.C. 1916)
  • State Ex Rel. Walker v. Sawyer 88 S.E. 894, (S.C. 1916)
  • Hartisville Oil Mill v. DuBose 88 S.E. 446, (S.C. 1916)
  • Turman v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 89 S.E. 655, (S.C. 1916)
  • Sarratt v. Wilkins 88 S.E. 647, (S.C. 1916)
  • Henderson v. McMaster, Insurance Commissioner 88 S.E. 645, (S.C. 1916)
  • Sparks v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 88 S.E. 739, (S.C. 1916)
  • McKellar v. Stanton 88 S.E. 527, (S.C. 1916)
  • State v. Rish 88 S.E. 531, (S.C. 1916)
  • All v. British American Mortgage Co., Ltd. 88 S.E. 529, (S.C. 1916)
  • Harrison v. Crosby 88 S.E. 1102, (S.C. 1916)
  • Jennings v. Jennings 88 S.E. 527, (S.C. 1916)
  • Saye v. Hill 88 S.E. 529, (S.C. 1916)
  • Lancaster v. City of Columbia 88 S.E. 463, (S.C. 1916)
  • Lea v. South Atlantic Pecan Co. 88 S.E. 530, (S.C. 1916)
  • Britton v. Hemingway 88 S.E. 462, (S.C. 1916)
  • Davis v. Blum 88 S.E. 465, (S.C. 1916)
  • Geer Drug Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 88 S.E. 447, (S.C. 1916)
  • Vermillion v. Woman's College of Due West 88 S.E. 649, (S.C. 1916)
  • Watson v. Southern Ry. Co. 88 S.E. 461, (S.C. 1916)
  • Sartor v. Newberry Land and Security Co. 88 S.E. 467, (S.C. 1916)
  • State Agricultural & Mechanical Soc. v. Taylor 88 S.E. 372, (S.C. 1916)
  • Mulligan v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 88 S.E. 445, (S.C. 1916)
  • Pearson v. Easterling 88 S.E. 376, (S.C. 1916)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑