James v. Victor Mfg. Co.
James v. Victor Mfg. Co.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action by plaintiff against the defendant for damages, actual and punitive, and for injunction, for alleged injuries to plaintiff’s property by emptying by the defendant of the sewage and other deleterious matter from its mill into an adjacent branch that flowed through the lands of plaintiff contaminating and polluting the waters, etc. After issue joined the case was tried before Judge Mauldin, and a jury at the January term of the Court, 1917, for Spartan-burg county.
*336
Order appealed from reversed.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Trial- — Nonsuit—Condition or Evidence. — There being sufficient evidence to carry the case to the jury on the issues, granting nonsuit was error. 2. Costs — On Appeal — Compliance With Rules. — Though there is a reversal, appellant’s attorneys, not conforming to the rules in manner of preparation of case for appeal, will not be allowed any costs for appeal.