State ex rel. Peeples v. Gibbes
State ex rel. Peeples v. Gibbes
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. It seems to me that the consent order proposed by Attorney General Peeples should be granted.
Opinion of the Court
the following order was made
It appearing that issues of fact as well as of law are to be determined in this case, and that the parties
As the issue iiivolved is one of public importance, the Circuit Court will give the case precedence in hearing and decision, so that, if appeal be taken to this Court, the same may be disposed of with all convenient speed at the approaching term.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE BY PEEPLES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. GIBBES
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Courts — South Carolina Supreme Court — Original Jurisdiction. — Under Court rule 25 (104 S. C. 534, 90 S. E. 11), declaring that neither the Supreme Court nor any Justice shall entertain motions for issuance of writs in the original jurisdiction when such motions can be made before Circuit Judges in the first instance without material prejudice to the rights of the parties, and that, if public interests are involved, or if special grounds of emergency exist where the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be exercised, those facts must be stated in the moving papers, the Supreme Court will decline to take original jurisdiction of a proceeding where the issues might be decided in the Circuit Court, and the case brought to the Supreme Court on appeal as early as it could be heard in exercise of the original jurisdiction.