Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1918

176 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1918.

  • State v. Duncan 96 S.E. 294, (S.C. 1918)
  • Clyde v. Southern Public Util. Co. 96 S.E. 116, (S.C. 1918)
  • Clyde v. Southern Public Utilities Co. 109 S.C. 290, (S.C. 1918)
  • Linder v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 96 S.E. 191, (S.C. 1918)
  • Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co. v. Limestone Globe Land Co. 96 S.E. 188, (S.C. 1918)
  • J. Van Lindley Nursery Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. 96 S.E. 221, (S.C. 1918)
  • Powell v. Southern Ry. Co. 96 S.E. 292, (S.C. 1918)
  • Tedder v. Tedder 96 S.E. 157, (S.C. 1918)
  • Sauls-Baker Co. v. Atlantic Coast L.R. Co. 96 S.E. 118, (S.C. 1918)
  • Loveland v. Collins 96 S.E. 124, (S.C. 1918)
  • Parham-Thomas-McSwain, Inc. v. Atlantic Life Insurance 96 S.E. 697, (S.C. 1918)
  • Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. Cave 96 S.E. 94, (S.C. 1918)
  • Ballentine v. Covington 96 S.E. 92, (S.C. 1918)
  • Scott v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 96 S.E. 305, (S.C. 1918)
  • Brown v. Piedmont Mfg. Co. 96 S.E. 138, (S.C. 1918)
  • Stouffer v. Roberts 96 S.E. 92, (S.C. 1918)
  • Bray v. Kress May 96 S.E. 135, (S.C. 1918)
  • Oliver v. McWhirter 96 S.E. 140, (S.C. 1918)
  • Sandifer v. Southern Ry. Co. 96 S.E. 120, (S.C. 1918)
  • Kirkland Distributing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 96 S.E. 122, (S.C. 1918)
  • Walker v. Henderson 95 S.E. 337, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Danhauer 96 S.E. 93, (S.C. 1918)
  • Daly v. Cementile Roofing Company 95 S.E. 333, (S.C. 1918)
  • Bartlett v. Aycock 95 S.E. 188, (S.C. 1918)
  • Vermillion v. Woman's College of Due West 97 S.E. 619, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Kennedy 95 S.E. 350, (S.C. 1918)
  • State, by Peeples, Atty. Gen. v. Gibbes 95 S.E. 346, (S.C. 1918)
  • Marion Cotton Oil Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. 95 S.E. 336, (S.C. 1918)
  • Williams v. Working Benevolent State Grand Lodge 95 S.E. 517, (S.C. 1918)
  • Brown v. Southern Ry. Co. 96 S.E. 701, (S.C. 1918)
  • Turner v. Clark 95 S.E. 334, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Ferebee 95 S.E. 133, (S.C. 1918)
  • Smith v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 95 S.E. 325, (S.C. 1918)
  • Reynolds v. Stockman 95 S.E. 341, (S.C. 1918)
  • Meyer v. Owens 95 S.E. 344, (S.C. 1918)
  • Smythe v. Monash 95 S.E. 138, (S.C. 1918)
  • Melton v. Cohammet Mills 95 S.E. 135, (S.C. 1918)
  • First Nat. Bk. of Hartsville v. Wood 95 S.E. 140, (S.C. 1918)
  • Hodge v. Piedmont & N. R. Co. 95 S.E. 138, (S.C. 1918)
  • Fulmer v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 95 S.E. 179, (S.C. 1918)
  • Josey v. Smith 95 S.E. 133, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Abney 95 S.E. 179, (S.C. 1918)
  • Rourk v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. 95 S.E. 79, (S.C. 1918)
  • Avent v. Proffitt 95 S.E. 434, (S.C. 1918)
  • O'Neill v. Cooper River Corp. 95 S.E. 124, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Waring 95 S.E. 143, (S.C. 1918)
  • Dantzler v. Riley 95 S.E. 132, (S.C. 1918)
  • Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 95 S.E. 180, (S.C. 1918)
  • Security Loan & Investment Co. v. Etheredge 95 S.E. 109, (S.C. 1918)
  • Roach v. Williams 95 S.E. 120, (S.C. 1918)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑