Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1918

256 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1918.

  • First Nat. Bk. of Hartsville v. Wood 95 S.E. 140, (S.C. 1918)
  • Hodge v. Piedmont & N. R. Co. 95 S.E. 138, (S.C. 1918)
  • Fulmer v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 95 S.E. 179, (S.C. 1918)
  • Josey v. Smith 95 S.E. 133, (S.C. 1918)
  • Branyan v. Tribble 95 S.E. 137, (S.C. 1918)
  • Sexton v. Noll Const. Co. 95 S.E. 129, (S.C. 1918)
  • Danielson v. Mixon 95 S.E. 515, (S.C. 1918)
  • Anthony v. Eve 95 S.E. 513, (S.C. 1918)
  • Snelgrove v. Anderson County 95 S.E. 1055, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Abney 95 S.E. 179, (S.C. 1918)
  • Rourk v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. 95 S.E. 79, (S.C. 1918)
  • Avent v. Proffitt 95 S.E. 434, (S.C. 1918)
  • O'Neill v. Cooper River Corp. 95 S.E. 124, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Waring 95 S.E. 143, (S.C. 1918)
  • Dantzler v. Riley 95 S.E. 132, (S.C. 1918)
  • Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 95 S.E. 180, (S.C. 1918)
  • Ferebee v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. 95 S.E. 349, (S.C. 1918)
  • Security Loan & Investment Co. v. Etheredge 95 S.E. 109, (S.C. 1918)
  • Roach v. Williams 95 S.E. 120, (S.C. 1918)
  • Tidwell v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co. 95 S.E. 109, (S.C. 1918)
  • Hurt v. Sands Co., Inc. 95 S.E. 111, (S.C. 1918)
  • Robinson v. McMaster. 95 S.E. 110, (S.C. 1918)
  • Breazeale v. Roach 95 S.E. 127, (S.C. 1918)
  • Carroll v. Town of York 95 S.E. 121, (S.C. 1918)
  • Hall v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 94 S.E. 870, (S.C. 1918)
  • Smythe v. Owen 95 S.E. 109, (S.C. 1918)
  • Keel v. Seaboard Air Line Railway 95 S.E. 64, (S.C. 1918)
  • Equitable Surety Co. v. Illinois Surety Co. 94 S.E. 882, (S.C. 1918)
  • Pierce v. Marion County Lumber Co. 94 S.E. 865, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Brown 95 S.E. 61, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Teal 95 S.E. 69, (S.C. 1918)
  • South Carolina Insurance Co. v. Kohn 95 S.E. 65, (S.C. 1918)
  • Glover v. Heyward 94 S.E. 878, (S.C. 1918)
  • Smoak v. Martin 94 S.E. 869, (S.C. 1918)
  • Robinson v. McMaster 94 S.E. 879, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Weston 94 S.E. 871, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Hewitt 95 S.E. 438, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Nole 94 S.E. 871, (S.C. 1918)
  • Ruff v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co. 96 S.E. 183, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Mason 94 S.E. 870, (S.C. 1918)
  • Outlaw v. Barnes 94 S.E. 868, (S.C. 1918)
  • Linley v. Citizens National Bank 94 S.E. 874, (S.C. 1918)
  • State v. Hollis 95 S.E. 74, (S.C. 1918)
  • Glenn v. Pacific Mills 94 S.E. 872, (S.C. 1918)
  • Woodrow v. Lillard 94 S.E. 1047, (S.C. 1918)
  • Bolen v. National Surety Co. 94 S.E. 1049, (S.C. 1918)
  • Huffman v. Owings 95 S.E. 78, (S.C. 1918)
  • Rentz v. Crosby 94 S.E. 1053, (S.C. 1918)
  • Pates & Allen Co. v. Bank of Norris 94 S.E. 880, (S.C. 1918)
  • Bank of Norris v. Pates & Allen Co. 94 S.E. 881, (S.C. 1918)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑