State v. Martin
State v. Martin
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The defendant was tried alone on a joint indictment with one George Williams, alleging joint use of an automobile without owner’s consent, and malicious mischief to personal property. The absent defendant, was in the army. The defendant was tried before Judge Wlison, and a jury, at *353 the Court of General Sessions for Greenville county. After conviction and sentence, defendant appeals and by thirteen exceptions imputes error and seeks reversal. The first six exceptions present the same question.
Exceptions 7, 10 and 11 complaint of-error in that the Court charged upon the facts. The exceptions are overruled, being without merit.
Exception 8 is overruled, being without merit.
Exception 13 is overruled. There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict. All exceptions overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State v. Martin.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. Criminal Law —Harmless Error —Instructions.—An instruction upon conspiracy in the tidal of one fo two defendants accused.of using an automobile without owner’s consent and malicious mischief to personal property, if error, was harmless, where the Court instructed that there was no charge of conspiracy. 2. Criminal Law — Appeal — Exceptions. — Exceptions which are too general will not be considered.