Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921

State v. Dix

State v. Dix
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided April 1, 1921 · Gary
106 S.E. 767; 115 S.C. 529; 1921 S.C. LEXIS 37 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. Jas. M. Patterson , for appellants, cites: The Act of 1917 ( 30 Stats. 69 , 169) was repealed by the enactment of the Eighteenth Amendment ( 253 U.S. 350 , 64 L.Ed. 946 , 40 Sup. Ct. 486 .) And the clause in that amendment permitting the States to pass "appropriate legislation" to enforce it does not include the Act of 1917. The Federal Constitution is a direct grant and the Eighteenth Amendment must be construed to be prospective: 8 Cyc. 731;. Robert L. Gunter, Solicitor , for respondent. Oral argument.

State v. Dix

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chies Justice Gary,

For the reasons stated in the case of the State v. Bill Hartley, 115 S. C. 523, 106 S. E. 766, in which the opinion has just been filed, the appeal in each of said cases is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.