Brabham v. Turner
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Brabham v. Turner, 109 S.E. 806 (S.C. 1921)
118 S.C. 30; 1921 S.C. LEXIS 190
Watts
Brabham v. Turner
Opinion of the Court
. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, sustaining the ordei: of Probate Judge in allowing a claim of Dr. Brabham against the estate of Miss Turner for board and lodging and medical services; the contention being that the claim for board and lodging should not be allowed, as the same were furnished as a gratuity. The exceptions, four in number, are overruled under the authority of Dash v. Inabinet, 53 S. C., 386; 31 S. E., 297; Wessinger v. Roberts, 67 S. C., 245; 45 S. E., 169; and Kaminer v. Kaigler, 113 S. C., 225; 102 S. E., 20.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In Re. Estate of Turner Brabham v. Turner Et Al.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Executors and Administrators—Finding That Board and Lodging Was Not Gratuitous Warranted, When There is Some Evidence of Declarations op Intention to Pat.—Where there was evidence of declarations by decedent, who was claimant’s wife’s aunt, at the time she came to live with claimant and his wife, and afterwards, concerning her intention to pay for her board, a finding was warranted that the board and lodging was not furnished as a gratuity.