Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1922

267 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1922.

  • Belton v. Wateree Power Co. 115 S.E. 587, (S.C. 1922)
  • Ex-Parte Planters' Bank 115 S.E. 299, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Portee 115 S.E. 238, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Martin 115 S.E. 252, (S.C. 1922)
  • Williams v. Hines, Director General 121 S.E. 600, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Owens 116 S.E. 927, (S.C. 1922)
  • McMahan v. McMahon 115 S.E. 293, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Goins 115 S.E. 232, (S.C. 1922)
  • Gibson v. Haynie, County Treasurer 115 S.E. 298, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Drake 115 S.E. 297, (S.C. 1922)
  • Troy v. Ætna Accident & Liability Co. 115 S.E. 325, (S.C. 1922)
  • Nichols v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. 115 S.E. 323, (S.C. 1922)
  • Strother v. Folk 115 S.E. 605, (S.C. 1922)
  • King Hardware Co. Bank v. McGill 115 S.E. 299, (S.C. 1922)
  • Friedman v. Fludas 115 S.E. 200, (S.C. 1922)
  • Dawkins v. Chester County 115 S.E. 62, (S.C. 1922)
  • Haddon v. Spartanburg County Highway Com'n 114 S.E. 856, (S.C. 1922)
  • Derrick v. City of Columbia 114 S.E. 857, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Talley 114 S.E. 859, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Moseley 114 S.E. 866, (S.C. 1922)
  • Doolittle v. Trigg 114 S.E. 869, (S.C. 1922)
  • Blue Ridge Power Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. 115 S.E. 306, (S.C. 1922)
  • Imperial Garage, Inc. v. Bank of Simpsonville 114 S.E. 760, (S.C. 1922)
  • Winthrop v. Allen 115 S.E. 745, (S.C. 1922)
  • Fox v. Clifton Mfg. Co. 114 S.E. 700, (S.C. 1922)
  • Dawkins v. Union Mfg. & Power Co. 114 S.E. 759, (S.C. 1922)
  • Keel, Adm'r. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 114 S.E. 761, (S.C. 1922)
  • American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. King 114 S.E. 861, (S.C. 1922)
  • Crooks v. Sanders, Superintendent 115 S.E. 760, (S.C. 1922)
  • Bowling v. Mangum 115 S.E. 212, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Epps 114 S.E. 631, (S.C. 1922)
  • Harter v. Johnson 115 S.E. 217, (S.C. 1922)
  • W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Thompson 114 S.E. 702, (S.C. 1922)
  • Lane v. Bell Lumber Co. 115 S.E. 207, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Hawkins 114 S.E. 538, (S.C. 1922)
  • Berry v. Caldwell 114 S.E. 405, (S.C. 1922)
  • Workman v. Thrower 114 S.E. 409, (S.C. 1922)
  • Bridges v. Daniel 114 S.E. 422, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Jeffords 114 S.E. 415, (S.C. 1922)
  • Stalnaker v. Tolbert 114 S.E. 412, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Thompson 115 S.E. 326, (S.C. 1922)
  • McFadden v. Anderson Motor Co. 114 S.E. 402, (S.C. 1922)
  • Hutchinson v. A.C.L.R. Co. 114 S.E. 323, (S.C. 1922)
  • Fairey v. Love 121 S.E. 263, (S.C. 1922)
  • Sparks v. Union Mfg. & Power Co. 114 S.E. 322, (S.C. 1922)
  • Killingsworth v. State Executive Com. Democratic Party 118 S.E. 822, (S.C. 1922)
  • Vann v. Jasper County 114 S.E. 704, (S.C. 1922)
  • White v. C. W.C. Railway Co. 114 S.E. 324, (S.C. 1922)
  • Continental Inv. Co. v. Matthews 113 S.E. 325, (S.C. 1922)
  • Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. 114 S.E. 500, (S.C. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑