Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922

Cathcart v. Hopkins

Cathcart v. Hopkins
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided April 11, 1922 · Coti
112 S.E. 64; 119 S.C. 190; 1922 S.C. LEXIS 63 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. G.W. Ragsdale, J.W. Hannahan and T.M. Cathcart for appellants. Mr. Cathcart cites: Court was without jurisdiction to render judgment against John H. Cathcart; the Committee not having been legally appointed: 14 Mass. 222 ; 4 Mason 121; 4 Gray 63; 32 Ark. 627 ; 64 Ga. 298 ; 12 Ala. 823 ; 70 Mass. 63 ; 15 Ill. 336 ; 5 Pick. 217; 24 N.E. 662, 30 N.E. 523; 21 R.C.L. 1262. Order cannot be made without notice to party to be prejudiced by it: 7 S.C. 235 . Procedure to obtain jurisdiction of lunatic in 1874: 15 Stat. 497 ; Code Proc. 1912, Sec. 185. Required bond not given: Rev. Stat. 1872, p. 484, Sec. 1; 3 S.C. 122 ; Freeman Void Jud. Sales, Sec. 22; 54 N.W. 335; 55 N.W. 965; 26 Miss. 646 ; 11 Minn. 347 ; 44 Miss. 591 ; 38 Me. 47 ; 81 Ky. 127 ; 28 Mich. 251 ; 30 Mich. 336 ; 24 Wis. 441 ; 26 N.Y. 338 ; 78 N.W. 20; 77 S.W. 1 ; 81 Ky. 127 ; 13 S. W 241 ; 32 S.W. 294 ; 42 S.W. 401; 68 S.W. 419. Without jurisdiction of person no committee could be appointed for his estate: 90 Ind. 54 ; 64 Ind. 194 ; 92 Am. Dec. 395; 9 Cal. 616 ; 62 Mo. 585 ; 27 Cent. Dig. "Insane Persons ," Sec. 51; 28 S.E. 922; 19 S.E. 624; 11 S.E. 123; 21 R.C.L. 1262; 19 S.E. 624. Notice must be addressed to party: 45 N.W. 1030; 101 N.W. 510; 126 N.W. 909; 40 P. 511. Requirements as to service on lunatics are positive: 17 S.C. 435 ; 23 S.C. 154 ; 23 S.C. 187 ; 24 S.C. 373 ; 25 S.C. 275 ; 31 S.C. 575 . Adjournment of Court unlawful: Rev. Stat. 1872, 571; 29 S.C. 237 ; 7 S.C. 373 . Suit by party in representative character: 8 Rich. L. 345; 108 S.C. 307 ; 16 S.W. 1035 . Pleadings must allege facts and not conclusions of law: 35 Hun. 281; 49 N.Y. 259 ; 41 Barb. 341; 12 How. 321; 115 U.S. 413 ; 9 Col. 304 . Guardian having adverse interest should not represent infant: 45 S.C. 323 . Trustee cannot purchase trust property: 212 Mass. 327 ; 213 Mass. 545 ; Pom. Eq. Jur. (2nd Ed.) Sec. 958. Lapse of time no bar to motion to set aside a void judgment: 5 S.C. 415 ; 17 S.C. 446 ; 48 S.C. 556 . Judgment void on face of record: 72 S.C. 131 ; 72 S.C. 576 . Messrs. McDonald McDonald and W.D. Douglas , for respondent, cite: Remedy is by motion in the cause: Code Proc. 1912, Sec. 225; 34 S.C. 452 ; 90 S.C. 558 ; 56 S.C. 1 ; 90 S.C. 418 ; 35 S.C. 613 ; 52 S.C. 307 ; 56 S.C. 96 . Purchasers at judicial sales where Court had apparent jurisdiction will be protected: 21 L.R.A. 1-54 (Note); 99 S.C. 110 . Voidable judgment can only be attacked by a direct proceeding: 89 S.C. 508 ; 76 S.C. 484 . Presumption of regularity in judgment: 106 S.C. 486 ; 89 S.C. 509 ; 79 S.C. 306 . John H. Cathcart charged with notice of enrolled judgment after his release from asylum: 56 S.C. 96 ; 91 S.C. 464 ; 105 S.C. 329 ; 26 S.C. 237 ; 29 S.C. 84 ; 32 S.C. 249 . With such notice, his claim is now barred: 32 S.C. 252 ; 56 S.C. 96 ; 107 S.C. 484 ; 108 S.C. 1 ; No defect in judgment and Court cannot disturb it: 105 S.C. 421 ; 77 S.C. 91 . Decree adjudged valid: 18 S.C. 123 . Estoppel: 77 Am.Rep. 572. No notice of inquisition in lunacy is necessary: 1 Rich. Eq. 477; 6 Rich. Eq. 388. Probate Corut had jurisdiction: Rev. Stat. 1870, 573. Judgment voidable, not void: 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 895; Buswell Insanity, par. 56, p. 898-9; 43 10. 616; 14 Mass. 222 ; 10 N J. Eq 190 ; 80 Me. 139 ; 15 Ill. 386 ; 129 Mass. 513 ; 137 Mass. 195 ; 75 Am.Dec. 213; 47 Am. Dec. 470.

Cathcart v. Hopkins

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Coti-iran.

The particulars of this litigation are set out in the circuit decree, which will be reported.

Except for the suggestion that the case of Cathcart v. Sugenheimer, 18 S. C. 123, is res judicata of the validity of the sale proceedings, the conclusions of the Circuit Judge are satisfactory to this Court. Argumentatively we think that the case referred to is conclusive.

It appears that in 1876 John H. Cathcart was judicially declared sane. His cause of action to set aside the various sales then arose, and the statute was not suspended by his subsequent lunacy. Cathcart v. Matthews, 105 S. C. 329, at page 346, 89 S. E. 1021. The various grantees having held for nearly 40 years, even if no time runs against a motion to set aside a void judgment, it would be idle to remand the case, even if the judgment were void.

The judgment of this Court is that the decree appealed from be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.