Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922

Derrick v. City of Columbia

Derrick v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided December 16, 1922 · Gary
114 S.E. 857; 122 S.C. 29; 114 S.E. 837; 1922 S.C. LEXIS 233 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. C.S. Monteith , for appellant, cites: Action does not fall within 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 3053. What amounts to taking of property by municipality: 7 Cooley Const. Lims., 781. City had right to establish abattoir: 1 Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 2939, Sec. 1593. Demurrer should be sustained: 111 S.C. 18 . Messrs. John Hughes Cooper and John E. Edens , for respondent.

Derrick v. City of Columbia

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint, the demurrer, the order overruling the demurrer, and the exceptions will be reported.

Section 2939 of the Civil Code of Daws 1912, is as follows :

“Establishment of Slaughter Pens: — Municipal corporations in this State containing five thousand inhabitants or more, may establish, or permit, or require the establishment of slaughter pens without and beyond their corporate limits, and may prescribe regulations for the establishment, maintenance and conduct of the same, and shall have the right to enforce all such regulations as if the same were estab *35 lished and conducted within the corporate limits. The police jurisdiction of any municipality that may establish, or permit the establishment of, a slaughter pen, or slaughter pens, shall extend to and cover the same, and all land and property necessarily used in connection therewith, not exceeding five acres, for the purpose of protecting and preserving the health in the inspection and slaughtering of animals for food, and in the protection and use of any such slaughter pen and grounds and- of the property therein or thereon, and in the transportation of meats from pens to such city, and in preserving peace and order at said pens and on said grounds.”

The allegations of the complaint that “the cause of such emission of offensive odors and gases from the said slaughterhouse is due to the construction of the plant, in that no adequate provision is made to prevent the noxious odors corrupting the atmosphere,” in effect charge negligence on the part of the defendant.

Conceding that the defendant had the authority, under Section 2939 of the Code of Taws 1912, to construct and maintain the plant, it was liable for such damages as were proximately caused by the negligent operation of the plant.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.