Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1922

267 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1922.

  • Brabham v. So. Express Co. 117 S.E. 368, (S.C. 1922)
  • Clinchfield Fuel Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co. 114 S.E. 543, (S.C. 1922)
  • Sloan v. Lee 114 S.E. 408, (S.C. 1922)
  • Mountcastle v. A. C. L. R. Co. 114 S.E. 631, (S.C. 1922)
  • Self v. Langley Mills 115 S.E. 754, (S.C. 1922)
  • Board of Commissioners v. Richardson 114 S.E. 632, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Green 113 S.E. 317, (S.C. 1922)
  • Cooper & Griffin, Inc. v. W. C. Cooke & Co., Inc. 115 S.E. 312, (S.C. 1922)
  • Self v. Langley Mills 115 S.E. 754, (S.C. 1922)
  • Black v. Todd 113 S.E. 793, (S.C. 1922)
  • Towill v. Southern Ry. Co. 114 S.E. 416, (S.C. 1922)
  • Lanham v. Jennings 113 S.E. 791, (S.C. 1922)
  • Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel Company 113 S.E. 688, (S.C. 1922)
  • Smythe v. Goode 113 S.E. 690, (S.C. 1922)
  • Boney v. Cornwell 113 S.E. 686, (S.C. 1922)
  • Shirley v. Parris 113 S.E. 788, (S.C. 1922)
  • Fleishman, Morris & Co. v. National Surety Co. 113 S.E. 686, (S.C. 1922)
  • Ryder v. Jefferson Hotel Company 113 S.E. 474, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Culbreath 113 S.E. 476, (S.C. 1922)
  • Rumler v. Gantt 113 S.E. 581, (S.C. 1922)
  • Crymes v. Gaul 117 S.E. 403, (S.C. 1922)
  • First Trust & Savings Bank v. Spratt 113 S.E. 473, (S.C. 1922)
  • Brooks v. Floyd 113 S.E. 490, (S.C. 1922)
  • McCrae v. Spires 113 S.E. 583, (S.C. 1922)
  • Hightower v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 113 S.E. 478, (S.C. 1922)
  • Sheriff v. Cartee 113 S.E. 579, (S.C. 1922)
  • Bushardt v. United Investment Co. 113 S.E. 637, (S.C. 1922)
  • Steele v. Boyd 113 S.E. 477, (S.C. 1922)
  • Gardner v. Jarrett 113 S.E. 493, (S.C. 1922)
  • Segars v. Folsom 113 S.E. 495, (S.C. 1922)
  • Sandel v. State of South Carolina 112 S.E. 571, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Redman 113 S.E. 467, (S.C. 1922)
  • Morris, Adm'r. v. Langley Mills 113 S.E. 632, (S.C. 1922)
  • Smith v. So. Ry. Co. 113 S.E. 465, (S.C. 1922)
  • Simmel v. Wilson 113 S.E. 487, (S.C. 1922)
  • Ex Parte Patterson, Blatt v. Blount 113 S.E. 467, (S.C. 1922)
  • Rylee v. Marett, Sheriff 113 S.E. 483, (S.C. 1922)
  • Blatt v. Blount 121 S.C. 78, (S.C. 1922)
  • Watson v. Motley 114 S.E. 412, (S.C. 1922)
  • Swift & Co. v. Goldberg 113 S.E. 358, (S.C. 1922)
  • Duncan v. Southern Railway Co. 113 S.E. 357, (S.C. 1922)
  • Sloan v. Greenville County 113 S.E. 349, (S.C. 1922)
  • Percival v. Faris 113 S.E. 353, (S.C. 1922)
  • First Trust & Savings Bank v. Pruitt 113 S.E. 469, (S.C. 1922)
  • Mull v. Easley Lumber Co. 113 S.E. 356, (S.C. 1922)
  • Patterson v. Orangeburg Fertilizer Co. 113 S.E. 318, (S.C. 1922)
  • Turner v. Southern Ry. Co. 113 S.E. 360, (S.C. 1922)
  • Berry v. Dillon Mills 113 S.E. 348, (S.C. 1922)
  • Morris v. Orangeburg Fertilizer Co. 113 S.E. 319, (S.C. 1922)
  • State v. Owens 117 S.E. 526, (S.C. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑