Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1923

Lanham v. Bomar

Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided March 15, 1923 · Watts, Chiee, Gary, Messrs, Fraser, Marion

116 S.E. 926; 123 S.C. 483; 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. L.E. Southard , for appellant, cites: Jurisdictional defects must affirmatively appear on the record: 48 S.C. 566 . Service on infant: 59 S.E., 378. Proper appointment of guardian ad litem: 61 S.C. 569 . Messrs. Bomar, Osborne Brown , for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

*486 The order of Judge Sease, appealed from -in this case, is affirmed, under the cases of Finley v. Robertson, 17 S. C., 435; Whitesides v. Barber, 24 S. C., 373; Riker v. Vaughan, 23 S. C., 187; Tederall v. Bouknight, 25 S. C., 275; Harrison v. Lightsey, 32 S. C., 293, 10 S. E., 1010; and the more recent case of Bradley v. Calhoun, 116 S. C., 7, 106 S. E., 843. Affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary, and Messrs. Justices Fraser and Marion concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.