Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924

Bailey v. Jerome

Bailey v. Jerome
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided October 25, 1924 · Watts, Messrs, Fraser, Cothran, Marion, Chiee, Gary
125 S.E. 29; 129 S.C. 387; 1924 S.C. LEXIS 58 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. Robert McC. Figg, Jr. , for appellants, cites: Under insurance policy payable to children, grandchildren take interest of their parent: 42 Conn., 60 ; 44 L.R.A., 689; 45 S.W., 784; 56 N.W., 535. Interest of children is vested and descends to their heirs: 114 S.C. 306 ; 97 S.C. 299 ; 128 U.S. 195 ; 212 Mass. 310 . Life insurance not contract Joyce Ins. 29, 65; 9 East., 72; 15 Com. B., 365. Messrs. Rutledge, Hyde Mann , for respondent, cite: Insurance policy must be construed according to the law of contracts: 41 L.R.A. (N.S.), 250; 115 N.Y., 152 ; 133 N.Y., 408 ; 80 N.E., 203 ; 46 Sou., 697; 13 R.I. 149 . Should not be treated as a testamentary disposition: 56 S.C. 10 ; 2 DeS. Eq., 309; Bail. Eq., 7; 1 Strob. Eq., 87; 16 S.C. 220 . Children will not include grandchildren: 59 S.C. 160 ; 6 Rich Eq., 401.

Bailey v. Jerome

Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

For the reasons assigned by his Honor Judge Memminger it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Fraser and Cothran concur. Mr. Justice Marion concurs in result. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary did not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.