Antley v. Antley

Counsel

Messrs. Adam H. Moss and P.F. Haigler and Nimocks Nimocks , for appellants, cite: No granting clause in deed: 39 S.C. 271 ; Rule in Shelley's Case; 36 S.C. 354 , 356 ; 67 S.C. 130 . Rule not applicable: 1 Strob. Eq., 346; 3 Rich. Eq., 550; 116 S.C. 229 ; 16 S.C. 290 ; 16 S.C. 303 ; 83 S.C. 265 . Intention of grantor given effect: 102 S.C. 227 . Messrs. Wolfe Berry and J. LeRoy Dukes , for respondents, cite: Intention a term of art: 106 S.C. 306 . Words conveying fee simple: 102 S.C. 361 . Words conveying fee conditional: 98 S.C. 460 ; 115 S.E., 605 . Rights under fee conditional: 10 R.C.L., 654; 98 S.C. 461 ; 16 S.C.L. (Harp. L.), 92; 26 S.C. Eq. (5 Rich. Eq.), 441; 98 S.C. 461 . "Bodily issue" and "children" distinguished: 115 S.E., 606; 83 S.C. 265 ; 3 Rich. Eq., 271; 67 S.C. 307 ; 16 S.C. 290 ; 10 S.C. 414 . Limitation after fee void: 115 S.E., 606; 109 S.C. 58 ; 106 S.C. 304 ; 93 S.C. 266 ; 76 S.C. 36 ; 76 S.C. 484 ; 5 Rich Eq., 356; 46 S.C. 267 . Condition burdening fee discharged: 116 S.C. 127 . Cases distinguished: 116 S.C. 233 ; 24 S.C. 228 .