Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926

Cathcart v. Jennings

Cathcart v. Jennings
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 1, 1926 · Watts, Messrs, Coti-Iran, Blease, Stabler, Ramage, Chiee, Gary
135 S.E. 558; 137 S.C. 450; 1926 S.C. LEXIS 197 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. G.W. Ragsdale and T.M. Cathcart , for appellants cite: Collusive judgment void: Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 3455. Statute of Frauds: Civ. Code, 1912, Sec. 3735, 3736 and 3737. Creation of trusts in lands to be in writing: Civ. Code 1912, Sec. 3676. In action to remove cloud on title complaint must allege title or possession in plaintiff: 125 Ala., 340 ; 108 S.C. 306; 13 S.C. 371 ; 7 S.C. 235 . Party having interest adverse to infant not proper guardian al litem: 45 S.C. 323 ; 23 S.E., 64 . Notice and opportunity to be heard essential to due process of law: 108 S.C. 305; 7 S.C. 235 ; 70 Mass. 63 ; 14 Mass. 222 ; 4 Mason 121; 2 N.J. Eq., 3 ; 3 Gray 63; 32 Ark. 627 ; 64 Ga. 298 ; 12 Ala., 825 ; 15 Ill., 336 ; 5 Pick., 217; 130 Ind., 555 ; 30 N.E., 523 ; 125 Ind., 46 ; 24 N.E., 662 ; 39 W. Va., 303 ; 19 S.E., 624 ; 23 L.R.A., 737; 45 A.S.R., 912; 86 Va., 763 ; 11 S.E., 123 ; 21 R.C.L., 1262. Service on defendant in State Lunatic Asylum: Code Civ. Pro. 1912, Sec. 185; 148 Iowa, 453 ; 126 N.W., 909 ; 125 Iowa, 670 ; 101 N.W., 510 ; 80 Iowa, 336 ; 45 N.W., 1030 ; 27 Ore., 282 ; 40 P., 511 ; 50 A.S.R., 726. Right to jury trial of title to land not to be defeated by the bringing of this action: Story on Eq. Jur., Sec. 859; Pomeroy on Eq. Jur., 2nd Ed., Secs. 246, 248, 252-254, 263, 1394 and 1396. Judgment void where record shows on its face that judgment based on void contract: 27 S.C. 525 ; 4 S.E., 229 ; 27 S.C. 425 ; 3 S.E., 790 ; 26 S.C. 517 ; 2 S.E., 402 ; 16 S.C. 92 ; 15 S.C. 581 ; 2 Pomeroy on Eq. Jur., 2nd Ed., Secs. 945 and 1121; 2 Story on Eq. Jur., Ed. of 1857, Secs. 1367 and 1397, Story on Sales, Ed. of 1853, Secs. 9, 40 and 44; Kerr on Law of Fraud Mistake, Ed. of 1872, 148; Bishop on Contracts, Ed. of 1878, Sec. 155; 1 Addison on Contracts, Ed. of 1881, Secs. 170 and 176. Lapse of time no bar to setting aside void judgment: 97 Cal., 388 ; 30 P., 452 ; 74 Cal., 400 ; 16 P., 196 ; 38 Mon., 166 ;; 88 F., 768. Messrs. McDonald McDonald and W.D. Douglas , for respondents, cite: Jurisdiction of subject matter defined: 123 N.C. 19 ; 68 A.S.R., 815; 15 R.C.L., 844. Judicial power of State vested: Const. 1868, Art. 4, Sec. 1. Jurisdiction of Common Pleas: Const. 1868, Art. 4, Sec. 15. Distinctions between law and equity abolished: Const. 1868, Art. 5, Sec. 3; Code Civ. Pro. of 1870. Jurisdiction of equity Court to remove cloud on title: 105 S.E., 767; 104 S.E., 273; 86 S.C. 7; 85 S.C. 546 ; 79 S.C. 420 ; 64 S.C. 229 ; 26 S.C. 1 ; 3 Pomeroy on Eq. Jur., Sec. 1398. Commencement of civil actions: Code Civ. Pro. 1922, Sec. 383. How Summons to be served: Code Civ. Pro. Sec. 390. Same; on adjudged lunatic: Code Civ. Pro. Sec. 390. Sub. 3. Court acquires jurisdiction by service of summons: Code Civ. Pro. 1922, Sec. 396. After acquisition of jurisdiction of defendant any irregularity in appointment of guardian ad litem does not affect jurisdiction of Court: 108 S.C. 10; 71 S.C. 17 ; 56 S.C. 96 ; 23 S.C. 166 . Court to appoint guardian ad litem for lunatic defendant: Code Civ. Pro. 1922, Sec. 392. Irregular and erroneous judgments distinguished: power to vacate irregular judgment: 144 Cal., 463 ; 103 A.S.R., 91; 94 Va., 760 ; 64 A.S.R., 777; 54 A.S.R., 218; 1 Bailey's Eq., 324; 1 Bailey's Eq., 107; 15 R.C.L., 739; 1 Black on Judgments, Secs. 170, 244, 329 and 363. As to service of answers of co-defendants on lunatic defendant: 128 S.C. 39. Movants to vacate judgment must show some injustice done them: 105 S.C. 421; 77 S.C. 85 ; 56 S.C. 96 ; 1 Bail. Eq., 324; 1 Bail. Eq., 283; 1 Bail. Eq., 179; 1 Bail. Eq., 113; 1 Bail. Eq., 108. Reversion and possibility of reverter distinguished: 23 R.C.L., 1100; 2 Blackstone Com., 175; 1 Tiffany on Real Property, 394. Reversion .

Cathcart v. Jennings

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

For the reasons assigned by Hon. A. L. Gaston, special Judge, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Coti-iran, BlEasE and Stabler and Mr. Acting Associate Justice Ramage concur. Mr. ChiEE Justice Gary did not participate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.