Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928

Davis v. Town of Saluda

Davis v. Town of Saluda
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 13, 1928 · MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS.
145 S.E. 412; 147 S.C. 498; 1928 S.C. LEXIS 169 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. Crouch Ramage, J. Wm. Thurmond , and Jeff D. Griffith , for appellants, cite: As to granting of temporary injunction: 84 S.C. 51 ; 69 S.C. 156 ; Id., 554; 42 S.C. 101 ; 51 S.C. 434 ; 54 S.C. 437 ; 62 S.C. 166 ; 67 S.C. 84 ; 2 High on Inj. (3rd Ed.), Secs. 1509, 1511, 1512. Same granted upon prima facie showing; does not dispose of the issues upon the merits: 69 S.C. 158 ; 48 S.C. 315 ; 25 S.C. 41 ; 34 S.C. 345 ; 60 S.C. 560 . As to taking of property without due process of law: 12 C.J., 1256; 240 U.S. 55 ; 109 Fed., 32; 166 U.S. 226 ; 100 U.S. 339 ; 105 U.S. 370 ; 118 U.S. 356 ; 162 U.S. 579 ; 154 U.S. 34 ; 96 U.S. 102 ; 164 U.S. 403 ; 2 Story Const., 1790; 1 Bl. Comm., 138, 139; Cooley Const. Lim., 559; 17 Johns, 195, 215; 20 Johns, 103, 106; 4 N.H. 134 , 142 ; 9 Ga. 341 ; 8 Eng. (Ark.), 199, 206; 70 N.C. 550 , 555 ; 20 Wall., 655; 35 S.Ct., 429 ; 145 N.W., 135; 230 U.S. 352 ; 236 U.S. 605 ; 108 Pac., 938; 114 N.W., 137; 14 L.R.A. (N.S.), 229; 231 U.S. 298 ; 56 Atl., 69; 198 U.S. 341 ; 37 So., 970; 173 U.S. 592 ; 57 S.W. 624; 118 U.S. 399 ; 55 N.Y., 657 ; 69 N.W., 955; 103 Fed., 584; 166 U.S. 226 ; 59 Pac., 520; 13 Mich., 329 ; 91 N.W., 867 ; 165 U.S. 578 . There may be a violation of the . Messrs. C.S. Montieth, Jr., George Bell Timmerman , and C.T. Graydon , for respondents, cite: No limitation as to amount of bonds which city or town may issue for waterworks and sewerage: 72 S.C. 532 ; 91 S.C. 413 . As .

Davis v. Town of Saluda

Concurring Opinion

Many of the issues passed by the late Judge DeVore in this case were decided in the recent case of Hunter v. Town of West Greenville,146 S.C. 338, 144 S.E., 62, and that case sustains the holdings of the circuit Judge.

Opinion of the Court

November 13, 1928. The opinion of the court was delivered by For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge DeVore, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, BLEASE, STABLER, and CARTER concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.