Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1929

139 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1929.

  • Harper v. Metropolitan Life Ins. 151 S.E. 60, (S.C. 1929)
  • Fountain Inn Oil Mill & Fertilizer Co. v. Owings 151 S.E. 927, (S.C. 1929)
  • Vogel v. Elford Agency 150 S.E. 774, (S.C. 1929)
  • Wilson v. Wilson 150 S.E. 897, (S.C. 1929)
  • Spartanburg County Highway Commission v. Southern Ry. Co. 150 S.E. 894, (S.C. 1929)
  • Sims v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. 150 S.E. 890, (S.C. 1929)
  • Woodworth v. Skeen 150 S.E. 764, (S.C. 1929)
  • Stilley v. Dawsey 150 S.E. 763, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Anderson 150 S.E. 786, (S.C. 1929)
  • Baltazzi v. McCormick 150 S.E. 900, (S.C. 1929)
  • Murchison Nat. Bank v. McInnis 150 S.E. 895, (S.C. 1929)
  • State ex rel. Daniel v. Anderson 153 S.C. 354, (S.C. 1929)
  • Alley v. Daniel 150 S.E. 691, (S.C. 1929)
  • Peeples v. Hornik 150 S.E. 802, (S.C. 1929)
  • Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co. 150 S.E. 789, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Fowler 150 S.E. 682, (S.C. 1929)
  • Finance Corp. of America v. Kristiansen 150 S.E. 652, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Wardlaw 150 S.E. 614, (S.C. 1929)
  • Blair v. Owens 150 S.E. 612, (S.C. 1929)
  • Ex Parte Andrews 150 S.E. 313, (S.C. 1929)
  • Camp Fornance Development Co. v. Palmetto Building & Loan Ass'n 150 S.E. 313, (S.C. 1929)
  • Durham v. Piedmont Credit & Adjustment Bureau 150 S.E. 351, (S.C. 1929)
  • Mortgage & Acceptance Corp. v. Broadwell 150 S.E. 345, (S.C. 1929)
  • Manning v. Brohun 150 S.E. 310, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Gilbert 150 S.E. 321, (S.C. 1929)
  • Columbia Nat. Bank v. Rizer 149 S.E. 316, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Griffin 150 S.E. 312, (S.C. 1929)
  • Jennings v. Southern Railway Co. 150 S.E. 309, (S.C. 1929)
  • Palmetto Lumber Co. v. Southern Ry. 151 S.E. 279, (S.C. 1929)
  • Linnen v. Commercial Casualty Co. 150 S.E. 127, (S.C. 1929)
  • Ansel v. Stribling 150 S.E. 125, (S.C. 1929)
  • State ex rel. Richards v. Ballentine 152 S.C. 365, (S.C. 1929)
  • Waring, Rec'r v. Johnson 149 S.E. 840, (S.C. 1929)
  • Walpole v. Wall, County Supt. 150 S.E. 760, (S.C. 1929)
  • Standard Motors Finance Co. v. Sansbury 149 S.E. 597, (S.C. 1929)
  • Conestee Mills v. City of Greenville 149 S.E. 595, (S.C. 1929)
  • Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 765, (S.C. 1929)
  • Smith v. Baldwin 149 S.E. 339, (S.C. 1929)
  • Skalowski v. Joe Fisher, Inc. 149 S.E. 340, (S.C. 1929)
  • Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. Morrison 149 S.E. 243, (S.C. 1929)
  • Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. v. Spartanburg Bonded Warehouse, Inc. 149 S.E. 236, (S.C. 1929)
  • Johnston v. Bagger 149 S.E. 241, (S.C. 1929)
  • Sellers v. Polson 149 S.E. 161, (S.C. 1929)
  • Moss v. Burdette 149 S.E. 235, (S.C. 1929)
  • Stewart v. Ficken 149 S.E. 164, (S.C. 1929)
  • American Fertilizing Co. v. Brigman 149 S.E. 105, (S.C. 1929)
  • J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Mims 149 S.E. 246, (S.C. 1929)
  • Nichols v. Congaree Fertilizer Co. 149 S.E. 162, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Faulkner 149 S.E. 108, (S.C. 1929)
  • Brewer v. Northwestern R. Co. of S.C. 149 S.E. 124, (S.C. 1929)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑