Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /South Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of South Carolina /

1929

245 Supreme Court of South Carolina opinions from 1929.

  • Carolina & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Alexander 151 S.E. 893, (S.C. 1929)
  • National Bank of South Carolina v. People's Grocery Co. 150 S.E. 478, (S.C. 1929)
  • Waring, Rec'r v. Johnson 149 S.E. 840, (S.C. 1929)
  • Augusta Power Co. v. Savannah River Elec. Co. 161 S.E. 767, (S.C. 1929)
  • Walpole v. Wall, County Supt. 150 S.E. 760, (S.C. 1929)
  • Lytle v. So. Ry. &8212 Carolina Division 149 S.E. 692, (S.C. 1929)
  • Dantzler v. Southern Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 750, (S.C. 1929)
  • Youngblood v. Southern Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 742, (S.C. 1929)
  • Standard Motors Finance Co. v. Sansbury 149 S.E. 597, (S.C. 1929)
  • Conestee Mills v. City of Greenville 149 S.E. 595, (S.C. 1929)
  • Norwood Nat. Bank v. Allston 149 S.E. 593, (S.C. 1929)
  • Fant, Examiner v. Home Bank Trust Co. 149 S.E. 599, (S.C. 1929)
  • Jenkins v. Southern Ry.—Carolina Division 150 S.E. 128, (S.C. 1929)
  • Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 765, (S.C. 1929)
  • Haynes v. Bank of Hartsville 149 S.E. 330, (S.C. 1929)
  • Harlem Corporation v. Eadie 149 S.E. 401, (S.C. 1929)
  • Smith v. Baldwin 149 S.E. 339, (S.C. 1929)
  • Shramek v. Walker 149 S.E. 331, (S.C. 1929)
  • Skalowski v. Joe Fisher, Inc. 149 S.E. 340, (S.C. 1929)
  • Mullis v. Pinnacle Flour & Feed Co. 149 S.E. 329, (S.C. 1929)
  • S. Landow & Co. v. Rizer 149 S.E. 225, (S.C. 1929)
  • Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. Morrison 149 S.E. 243, (S.C. 1929)
  • Connelly v. State Co. 149 S.E. 266, (S.C. 1929)
  • Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. v. Spartanburg Bonded Warehouse, Inc. 149 S.E. 236, (S.C. 1929)
  • Wilbur v. Mortgage Loan Co. 149 S.E. 262, (S.C. 1929)
  • Johnston v. Bagger 149 S.E. 241, (S.C. 1929)
  • Rainwater v. Bonnette 149 S.E. 254, (S.C. 1929)
  • Veronee v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co. 149 S.E. 753, (S.C. 1929)
  • Sellers v. Polson 149 S.E. 161, (S.C. 1929)
  • Moss v. Burdette 149 S.E. 235, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Brody 149 S.E. 926, (S.C. 1929)
  • Stewart v. Ficken 149 S.E. 164, (S.C. 1929)
  • Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Bamberg, E. & W. Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 271, (S.C. 1929)
  • Augusta Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co. 149 S.E. 924, (S.C. 1929)
  • American Fertilizing Co. v. Brigman 149 S.E. 105, (S.C. 1929)
  • Bober v. Southern Railway Co. 149 S.E. 257, (S.C. 1929)
  • J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Mims 149 S.E. 246, (S.C. 1929)
  • Nichols v. Congaree Fertilizer Co. 149 S.E. 162, (S.C. 1929)
  • State v. Faulkner 149 S.E. 108, (S.C. 1929)
  • Brewer v. Northwestern R. Co. of S.C. 149 S.E. 124, (S.C. 1929)
  • Sanders v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. 149 S.E. 109, (S.C. 1929)
  • Manley v. Bailey 149 S.E. 119, (S.C. 1929)
  • Snipes v. Augusta-Aiken Ry. & Electric Corp. 149 S.E. 111, (S.C. 1929)
  • Davis v. Campbell 149 S.E. 1, (S.C. 1929)
  • Alexander v. Kerhulas 149 S.E. 12, (S.C. 1929)
  • State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co. 153 S.E. 537, (S.C. 1929)
  • Stubbs v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co. 149 S.E. 2, (S.C. 1929)
  • Hill v. Broad River Power Co. 148 S.E. 870, (S.C. 1929)
  • Smith v. Littlejohn 148 S.E. 719, (S.C. 1929)
  • Town of Bennettsville v. Godbold 148 S.E. 710, (S.C. 1929)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑