Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932

Alexander v. Alexander

Alexander v. Alexander
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided February 1, 1932 · Bease, Bonham, Carter, Cothran, Dennis, Messrs, Stabler
162 S.E. 437; 164 S.C. 466; 82 A.L.R. 719; 1932 S.C. LEXIS 20 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. J.B. Atkinson, Bomar Osborne for appellant, cite: Court of Equity may modify the provisions of decree as to alimony: 120 Md., 584 ; 154 Md., 675; 152 Md., 49 . Support of children and alimony may be modified: 157 Md., 166 ; 158 Md., 109. Attorney's fees never allowed except on special contracts: 96 S.C. 357 . Right to alimony not vested right but subject to power of Courts to modify: 181 U.S. 183 ; 45 L.Ed., 810 . Messrs. F.B. Gary, Jr., J.D. Kerr, Jr. , and R.W. Baldwin, Jr. , for respondent, cite: One state is bound by alimony decree of another state as to installments already accrued: 218 U.S. 1 ; 52 Md., 50 ; 47 App. D.C., 384 ; 86 N.J.L., 69 ; 19 C.J., 364. Reduction of alimony can only apply to future installments: 145 Md., 340 ; 120 Md., 584; 13 App. D.C., 334 . Judgment cannot be attacked collaterally except for lack of jurisdiction or fraud: 122 S.C. 323 ; 144 S.C. 83 . Maintenance and alimony synonymous: 187 Pac., 609;.

Alexander v. Alexander

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Bease.

It is our opinion that the well-prepared order of his Honor, County Judge Foster, in this case is correct. Accordingly, the exceptions thereto are overruled, and the order is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham and Mr. F. C. Dennis, Circuit Judge, concur. Mr. Justice Cothran did not participate on account of illness.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.