Campbell v. Williams

Counsel

Messrs. Cantey Elliott , for appellant, cite: Issue is word of limitation not of purchase: 83 S.C. 265 ; 65 S.E., 241 . As to rule in Shelley's case: 52 S.C. 554 ;. Messrs. T.C. Brown, Heyward Brockinton, Waller Bailey and Charles B. Elliott , for respondents, cite: Fee-simple conditional estate: 3 Rich. Eq., 271; 1 Brevard, 331; 5 Rich. Eq., 441; 14 S.C. 597 ; 16 S.C. 312 . Issue defined: 83 S.C. 265 ; 2 Hill Law, 42; 7 Rich. Eq., 264; 10 S.C. 426 ; 16 S.C. 312 . Where rule in Shelley's case does not apply: 1 N. McC., 69; 2 McCord, 335; Bailey's Eq., 37, 42, 292, 390, 536; 1 Rich. Eq., 79; 1 Rich., 265; 1 Strob. Eq., 193; 4 Rich. Eq., 263; 7 Rich. Eq., 407; 16 S.C. 294 ; 27 S.C. 480 ; 28 S.C. 495 ; 67 S.C. 130 ; 45 S.E., 137 ; 42 S.E., 342; 20 S.E., 161. Word heirs used in the sense of children it is word of purchase and not of limitation: 76 S.C. 484 ; 57 S.E., 614 ; 102 S.C. 7 ; 91 S.C. 300 ; 74 S.E., 374 ; 107 S.E., 914; 29 S.C. 135 ; 7 S.E., 53 ; 123 S.C. 371 ; 10 S.C. 376 .