Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936

Lay v. State Rural Electrification Authority

Lay v. State Rural Electrification Authority
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 9, 1936 · Fishburne, Stabler, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Jystice, Gaston
188 S.E. 368; 182 S.C. 32; 1936 S.C. LEXIS 5 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. F. Ehrlich Thomson , for appellant, cites: Easement: 18 S.C. 254 ; 20 C.J., 721; 147 N.E., 146. Mr. R. Beverly Herbert , for respondent, cites: Easement: 128 S.C. 481 ; 123 S.E., 205 ; 20 C.J., 324; 106 N.E., 556 ; L.R.A., 1915-B, 822; 197 Mass. 199 ; 83 N.E., 415 ; 125 A.S.R., 338; 14 L.R.A. (N.S.), 194; 300 P., 165 .

Lay v. State Rural Electrification Authority

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice FishburnE.

*38 After a carfeul examination of the record in this case, and consideration of the single issue presented, the Court is satisfied with the well-considered order of his Honor, G. Duncan Bellinger, Circuit Judge, which will be reported.

The judgment of the Court is that the exceptions be dismissed, and that the judgment of the Circuit Court be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler, Messrs. Justices Bonham and Baker and Mr. Acting Associate JysTicE A. L. Gaston concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.