Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936

Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.

Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided October 29, 1936 · Chiee, Stabeer, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Eishburne, Gaston
188 S.E. 182; 182 S.C. 9; 1936 S.C. LEXIS 2 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. R.B. Harrelson and L.D. Lide , for appellants, cite: Equitable offset: 165 S.C. 448 ; 161 S.C. 77 ; 91 S.C. 163 ; 133 S.C. 431 ; 168 S.E., 103 ; 159 S.W. 838; 146 U.S. 499 ; 36 L.Ed., 1959 ; 136 S.C. 179 ; 47 A.S. R., 576, 172, 276; 131 N.E., 857 ; 166 A., 871 ; 80 A.L.R., 1480. Assets of insolvent corporation should be distributed ratably among creditors: 77 S.C. 310 . Mr. A.F. Woods , for respondents, cites: As to agreed stipulation of fact: 174 S.C. 24 ; 176 S.E., 880 ; 114 S.C. 494 ; 104 S.E., 184 ; 156 S.C. 480 ; 153 S.E., 462 ; 175 S.C. 291 ; 179 S.E., 34 ; 176 S.C. 318 ; 180 S.E., 188 . Offset: 7 C.J., 641; 101 S.C. 457 ; 86 S.E., 26 ; 172 S.C. 305 ; 174 S.E., 23 ; 91 S.C. 163 ; 74 S.E., 361 ; 136 S.C. 179 ; 134 S.E., 285 ; 131 N.E., 857 ; 16 A.L.R., 1484; 90 A., 369 ; 166 A., 871.

Brown v. Lowe Et Ux.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabeer.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Dennis correctly construed the written agreement referred to in his order, and that he properly disposed of all issues involved in the case. Eor the reasons, therefore, stated by him in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Eishburne, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice A. L. Gaston concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.