Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936

City of Spartanburg v. Leonard

Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided June 10, 1936 · Chiee, Stabler, Messrs, Carter, Bonham, Baker, Fishburne

186 S.E. 395; 180 S.C. 491; 1936 S.C. LEXIS 145 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Messrs. Hamer Leonard , for appellant, cite: Holders of municipal bonds charged with notice of provisions thereof: 163 S.C. 242 ; 161 S.E., 454 ; 44 S.C. 319 ;. Messrs. Evans, Galbraith Holcombe , for respondent, cite: Redemption: 177 S.C. 286 ; 181 S.E., 30 ; 143 S.C. 104 ; 141 S.E., 180 ; 148 S.C. 326 ; 146 S.E., 92 ; 16 S.C. 416 ; 68 S.C. 554 ; 48 S.E., 4 ; 1 Ann. Cas., 747; 25 R.C.L., 1030. Construction of statute: 152 Ga. 836 ; 111 S.E., 379 ; 8 W. Va., 612 ; 117 Md., 373 ; 83 A., 564 ; 3 McC., 298; 53 S.C. 448 ; 31 S.E., 334 ; 144 U.S. 550 ; 36 L.Ed., 537 ; 169 S.C. 314 ; 168 S.E., 722 ; 95 U.S. 760 ; 24 L.Ed., 588 ; 6 L.Ed., 603; 8 L.Ed., 308 ; 8 L.Ed., 587 . Supplying word where omitted from statute: 128 Ky., 424 ; 108 S.W. 892 ; 169 N.C. 631 ; 86 S.E., 577 ; 144 Wis. 210 ; 128 N.W., 1063 ; 91 Va., 68 ; 20 S.E., 950 ; 113 Ga. 127 ; 38 S.E., 303 ; 35 P., 188; 54 N.E., 967; 133 P., 861; 3 A.L.R., 404; 104 S.C. 342 ; 88 S.E., 894 .

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler.

We have given careful consideration to the questions presented by the appeal in this case, and are satisfied with the conclusions reached and expressed by the Circuit Judge. Plis well-considered decree, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed and adopted as the judgment of this Court.

Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.